"May" is the key word here.
Pigs also "may" fly out of my ass, but it's extremely unlikely that they will. Wisconsin and nebraska "may" have been better had they hired the right coach, but collectively they've whiffed 5 times in a row.
It's quite possible the game might have passed him by. But I'm not ready to start playing russian roulette when the current guy is winning way more than he's losing.
Terrible argument. Statistically, almost every football team regresses when there's a coaching change. Very, very few improve their performance and even fewer maintain that improved performance. That's not my opinion, that's fact. Give us a list of hires contrary to that if you want me to believe there's a good chance of improvement, and I'll give you a list of 100 hires that shit the bed.
Consistency is the one thing almost all teams nowadays lack and Iowa under Fry and Ferentz have it. If that's not enough for you that's your opinion, but don't try and tell us there's anything even close to a 50/50 chance that a coaching hire at Iowa works out. It's more like 98/2 that it gets worse.
Look at the list
@99topdawg posted of the number of teams that have won at least 8 games each of the past 10 years. It's pretty short, pal.
Alabama
Ohio State
Clemson
Georgia
Iowa
And you want to mess with things...You don't understand how this whole thing works.