Can Mizzou and A&M continue with their disruption of the SEC?

[KansasHawkeye]

The most feared conference in the land has been dominated by some Big 12 upstarts (well...except the SEC elite teams.) How good can the SEC really be top to bottom with these two teams winning so many games?

 

[NCHawker]

I think you're starting with a false premise. Texas A&M has not dominated...they just had a high profile. Mizzou was competitive by making it to the CCG.

 

[NCHawker]

I think you're starting with a false premise. Texas A&M has not dominated...they just had a high profile. Mizzou was competitive by making it to the CCG. Mizzou had to survive the East with beat up UGA squad, a weaker Florida and Tennesee and Beat USC. Good teams but not awesome.

 

[imported_ankle23]

missou was 'competitive'..........

year in year out the conference make up is varied, depending on injuries, coaching changes, etc. you can't discount a team because other school are perceived as 'not as good' as they used to be, etc.

 

[okeefe4prez]

Wasn't Mizzou just total garbage their first year in the SEC? And A&M won a few big games, but let's face it, without Johnny Football and Jake Matthews, that team is gonna quickly slide into Iowa State laughingstock territory.

 

[74Hunter]

Big 12 football >>>>>> $EC football

 

[HawkeyeWalker]

Big 12 football >>>>>> $EC football

Top to bottom I see the PAC being the best this year.

 

[KansasHawkeye]

The original post was to point out that most of the SEC is regularly beatable, even by spread Big 12 teams. You don't need smash mouth studs to end up in the championship game with a chance to win it.

 

[JonDMiller]

I think both Mizzou and A&M fall back this year, but I also think the SEC love is a bit of an echo chamber.

 

[bigjim]

Its going to be really hard to keep a sec team out of the championship gm this yr.