blubberhawk
Well-Known Member
Some of you are never happy. First there is a clamor to play the backups. Play Stanley. Get experience to build on for next year. Then it's "pulled the starters too early".
Well I am in the camp of....They got some good experience but we also saw that there is a big drop off from the number one's to the backups. Stanley looks decent, but he isn't ready for prime time. I think it clear that Iowa is a young team. We have some good experienced upper class men and when they go down, Iowa is hurting.
As we have seen with Vandenburg. He was Iowa's one good receiver and with him out Iowa is trying to get our young receivers up to speed. The youngsters may not make the grade this year, but this experience will pay big dividends next year and beyond.
He pulled the starters at 42-14 with the ball on Purdue's side of the field. Maybe a series early but he'd already lost Meyers and Kittle. The 2nd team flopped.
If he keeps the first team in and Iowa wins 56-21 but King/Jewell/Welsh etc gets dinged up, he's getting killed on here right now. He's damned if does, damned if he doesn't.
I was not enamored with how he subbed yesterday, but I continue to be more upset about his philosophy. Game after game, we let really average quarterbacks look like All-Americans by staying in the same damn vanilla defenses. Very little stunting or blitzing. Heat the damn kid up! Hurry his throws. And get some guys on the field (if we have any) that can run in obvious passing situations. (meaning the entire damn second half yesterday) Wisconsin was blitzing guys all night long from all over the field last night against OSU. Their kids played with intensity and fire. I am sure they loved the aggressiveness their coach was allowing them to play with.
The Iowa way (4 slow guys rushing the passer + 3 slow linebackers dropping in coverage) = 450 passing yards by a very average qb. And keep in mind, he threw for this many yards with out any semblance of a running attack.