Was watching NW replay, and I have to say when DB wore #32 he ran much harder and saw the cut back and holes much better. He even trucked a few lbs and he was probably 20lbs less than he is now. I'm not sure if this is coaching, shell shock or what is going on but his digression in running the ball is noticeable. Yes, I am aware it is not the number. I thought after his freshman year he could be quite good, but just never really improved. Would love to see him have a breakout game, and finally put it all together.
Bullock should change back to #32
- Thread starter Hawkcrush
- Start date
guffus
Well-Known Member
What was really confusing is when Bullock switched to #5 there already was a #5 starting on defense, Tanner Miller, I think. I cant believe they let him have a number that another starter already had.
But when it comes down to it, Bullock is the first regular running back to last 4 straight years since who knows? Just for that, he should get any number he wants.
But when it comes down to it, Bullock is the first regular running back to last 4 straight years since who knows? Just for that, he should get any number he wants.
HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
Who had #32 after Bullock gave it up?
MikeyLikesIowa
Well-Known Member
According the current official roster, #32 belongs to redshirt freshman RB Andrew Wellik.
HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
OK, so maybe the Iowa coaching staff was trying a little transference with the number 5 and another Iowa running back from Texas, Sedrick Shaw?
