Add into the points above, look at the land that is sacrificed or that it takes to accommodate these wind farms and solar for that matter.Electric vehicles (with the tech that exists today) are a stupid idea. The emissions are pretty comparable, it's just that they happen at the power plant rather than the tail pipe. 79% of energy production in the country is fossil fuel today. So at the very most, having a 100% electric vehicle is only cutting emissions from gas or diesel by 21%. And lets not forget the fossil fuels consumed by construction and creation of wind farms in the first place which is pretty much 100% fossil. An average wind tower from creation to end of useable life uses way more energy than it will ever produce, and it also creates more emissions than it saves. And that doesn't scale down with quantity, either.
All that said above doesn't also doesn't account for electric grid capacity which is a whole 'nother preventative animal.
The practical answer (like all things in life) lies between two extremes. Until we convert to nuclear power in the US which will not happen in my lifetime, hybrid vehicles are the best solution. Gasoline or diesel when you need it in cold weather, in rural areas, etc...and electric when you don't such as interstate trips between charging stations, urban driving, good weather, etc.
If the right and the left would realize that we'd be in a good place. But the libs want 100% electric without being even remotely practical (might have something to do with the majority of them living in friendly climates in dense urban areas), and the conservatives hanging on to gas just to spite the libs.
Me? I'm just gonna sit back and laugh at the two sides wanking each other into oblivion for the next 30 or so years that I have left. Nothing is going to change from either side so what else do you do?
I think you are becoming your father. Or, GrandfatherElectric vehicles (with the tech that exists today) are a stupid idea. The emissions are pretty comparable, it's just that they happen at the power plant rather than the tail pipe. 79% of energy production in the country is fossil fuel today. So at the very most, having a 100% electric vehicle is only cutting emissions from gas or diesel by 21%. And lets not forget the fossil fuels consumed by construction and creation of wind farms in the first place which is pretty much 100% fossil. An average wind tower from creation to end of useable life uses way more energy than it will ever produce, and it also creates more emissions than it saves. And that doesn't scale down with quantity, either.
All that said above doesn't also doesn't account for electric grid capacity which is a whole 'nother preventative animal.
The practical answer (like all things in life) lies between two extremes. Until we convert to nuclear power in the US which will not happen in my lifetime, hybrid vehicles are the best solution. Gasoline or diesel when you need it in cold weather, in rural areas, etc...and electric when you don't such as interstate trips between charging stations, urban driving, good weather, etc.
If the right and the left would realize that we'd be in a good place. But the libs want 100% electric without being even remotely practical (might have something to do with the majority of them living in friendly climates in dense urban areas), and the conservatives hanging on to gas just to spite the libs.
Me? I'm just gonna sit back and laugh at the two sides wanking each other into oblivion for the next 30 or so years that I have left. Nothing is going to change from either side so what else do you do?
Never met either of my grandfathers and I’m the exact opposite of my dad which isn’t a bad thing. Either way, my life is statistically more than half over, I ain’t gonna spend the rest of it worrying about who to vote for or why, or why I should done an electric or gas car. My time is better spent laughing at the absurdity of it.I think you are becoming your father. Or, Grandfather