docholihawk
Well-Known Member
Surprised Eno didn't sign with this news.
By "Barta paradox," I assume you mean the paradox of whether an AD who has no real power over the football program is really an AD, correct?I would agree but then there's the Barta paradox.
Wasn't GD call an offensive mastermind before the bowl game? I think it can get worseThere's a lot of young ahd hungry coaches that want to succeed very badly and fail. I was hoping for some new blood from outside the program but he can't be worse than Davis
I think actually the big booster money runs Kinnick. Should Kirk fall out of favor with them Kirk won't be able to save Kirk.The Barta side of things is irrelevant.... That's all for show. Fort Kinnick is ran by KF.
Yes CorrectBy "Barta paradox," I assume you mean the paradox of whether an AD who has no real power over the football program is really an AD, correct?
Perhaps. But we're just nowhere near that point. There's too much money on the hook going to him now for too many years right now. I'm not sure what it'd take for him to get fired be it a 3 win season or some scandal of some kind. Neither of which is most likely to happen.I think actually the big booster money runs Kinnick. Should Kirk fall out of favor with them Kirk won't be able to save Kirk.
Oh absolutely sub-par recruiting, better coaches at Illinois, Purdont and Minnesota, question mark at Nebraska. It could be a tough road here in 3 years if OSU, Michigan, PSU and MSU all stay solid. Hell we barely beat Rutgers!Perhaps. But we're just nowhere near that point. There's too much money on the hook going to him now for too many years right now. I'm not sure what it'd take for him to get fired be it a 3 win season or some scandal of some kind. Neither of which is most likely to happen.
MSU had a way worse year then we did this year... The top 3 you mentioned already are good so I don't see it being any harder if they stay good... I'm not saying we are good right where we are I'm just poking holes in your assessment. MN and Illinois are who I'm more worried about. If they were to get good that'd changing the recruiting landscape for sure.Oh absolutely sub-par recruiting, better coaches at Illinois, Purdont and Minnesota, question mark at Nebraska. It could be a tough road here in 3 years if OSU, Michigan, PSU and MSU all stay solid. Hell we barely beat Rutgers!
I didn't take alot of time on that so poke away but anytime you get a new crop of coaches in the conference some with very good sustained winning pedigree it's a problem for us because they will start with the 3 and 2 start guys we usually pull late from the MAC midgets. Interesting you left out Brohm at Purdont. I think he will have more success at Purdont than Lovie will have at Illinois relatively speaking.MSU had a way worse year then we did this year... The top 3 you mentioned already are good so I don't see it being any harder if they stay good... I'm not saying we are good right where we are I'm just poking holes in your assessment. MN and Illinois are who I'm more worried about. If they were to get good that'd changing the recruiting landscape for sure.
I disagree with ya about Purdue. I think being where they are they are the Iowa State of Indiana. With ND and Indiana in state competing for kids not to mention being in the east division they have an impossible road to climb to get to respectability. They aren't leap frogging PSU, OSU, Michigan, or even MSU anytime soon. Illinois has a better shot but they aren't exactly at a good spot in their program either. Lovie hasn't gotten off to the greatest of starts but if were to ever get off the ground his ceiling for that program would be higher then Purdues. I guess I could see Purdue being a better team but their record not showing it. I could get down with that analysis. I mean they have 4 or 5 losses in the BIG at the least almost no matter what penciled in regardless of how well they do.I didn't take alot of time on that so poke away but anytime you get a new crop of coaches in the conference some with very good sustained winning pedigree it's a problem for us because they will start with the 3 and 2 start guys we usually pull late from the MAC midgets. Interesting you left out Brohm at Purdont. I think he will have more success at Purdont than Lovie will have at Illinois relatively speaking.
Well first you have to get your divisions straight or else your comments fall apart like a house of cards. Purdue plays in the WEST not the EAST so there climb isn't nearly as tough. Iowa will continue a steady decline heading toward KF's lifetime contract. While it is true that they are currently 3rd in the state they can easily out recruit Indiana now that Wilson is gone and at OSU. And the style of offense Brohm runs he can give people problems with less talent. Unfortunately, Kirk Foments thinks it's simply execution in the pro-style. I'm pretty sure that talent has something to do with it too.I disagree with ya about Purdue. I think being where they are they are the Iowa State of Indiana. With ND and Indiana in state competing for kids not to mention being in the east division they have an impossible road to climb to get to respectability. They aren't leap frogging PSU, OSU, Michigan, or even MSU anytime soon. Illinois has a better shot but they aren't exactly at a good spot in their program either. Lovie hasn't gotten off to the greatest of starts but if were to ever get off the ground his ceiling for that program would be higher then Purdues. I guess I could see Purdue being a better team but their record not showing it. I could get down with that analysis. I mean they have 4 or 5 losses in the BIG at the least almost no matter what penciled in regardless of how well they do.