By your reasoning, since Gonzaga did not live up to their past seeds, they represent themselves as a Mid-Major (who we all expect not to live up to their billing at the NCAA tourney). But Iowa's last 10 years in the NCAA tourney was:
2014 (11 seed) loss
2006 (3 seed) loss......really?
2005 (10 seed) loss
H*##, Zaga has at least 8 NCAA wins in that time period. No matter what #1 seed Iowa plays, it is a for sure loss, IF they would get past the first game, and that is a BIG IF, based on their past experience......since that is what you are using to determine this year's teams, right?
I do understand the conventional wisdom thinking Gonzaga does not have as good as athletes as the other #1 seeds, and this would make them an easier upset possibility. BUT, I think if Gonzaga was playing Iowa, they would love nothing better than beating a Big 10 team and have that David vs Goliath mentality. The other #1 seeds may overlook Iowa and thus Iowa MAY actually have a better chance to beat them.