Guys who have beefs at some of the weights:
141 - An argument could be made that Marion should be seeded over Thorn, but as CRWrestling said, difference between a 2 and 3 is negligible
149 - Molinaro got shafted here. Molinaro beat Ruschell head-to-head in the PSU-Wisconsin dual. If Ruschell would have wrestled Metcalf in the IA-Wiscy dual, they'd have the same record (6-2) in Big 10 dual competition. Ruschell did beat Palmer at the Cliff Keen Invitational in Vegas, but a head-to-head win and the only reason Ruschell has the better record is due to "ducking" Metcalf? Give me a break.
157 - Interesting to see 2 different coaches decide their Big 10 team rep at this weight 2 different ways. Tom Ryan has Jameson and Nemec wrestle-off with Nemec winning. Nemec ends up with the 7 seed (a Big 10 dual record of 2-2, W over Jones, Arliss; L to Kinser, Janssen). Jameson had MUCH better conference wins (3-1 Big 10 dual record, W over Salazar, Johnson, Bialka; L to Sanderson). Jameson would have probably been given the 5 seed.
HWT - Wade getting the 3 seed over Berhow is utterly ridiculous. They have the same Big 10 dual season record (6-2), plus Berhow beat Wade in the MN-PSU dual. The only logic I see is Berhow lost to Apland at Midlands (but later avenged that loss in the Michigan-Minnesota dual). Again, records in Big 10 duals play the biggest factor, and Berhow's head-to-head win over Wade should have trumped and given him the 3 seed.