Section136
Well-Known Member
One play caused a 14 point swing.
A play that was made by the defense. Its not like Chappell just threw the ball into Sash's hands. The pressure caused the deflection and Sash was in the right spot at the right time.
One play caused a 14 point swing.
Yeah. Because that's such a ridiculous question to ask. Is this Mary? Or just "a" mary...
Remind me not to buy stock in your company. "NO...we're not making our numbers, and sales are on the decline. But look how many of our guys have gone on to better jobs!"
Who's the idiot?
I will agree that allot of those losses in 2008 were flukes that went against Iowa. But part of that was Stanzi not getting any playing time the previous season, where just like last year the starter should have been pulled in blowouts to get the next guy at least acclimated to what a game is like.
Im not saying KF shouldn't be given credit for 09, just like he should be given credit for all the terrible losses the last 3 years. He should also be given credit for beating allot of good teams at the same time.
But, 7 out of the last 8 years he has taken more talented teams and lost games to lesser talented teams. That is a consistent pattern. The one year where it didn't happen, it was only due to two fluke plays.
Last years losses to CMU, ISU ect are no different than all of the other times it has happened.
We have had a lot of good players recently. Pretty impressive
You might be the only person to think that Stanzi should have played as a RS freshman in 2007. JC was bad but Stanzi wasnt ready.
Actually it will fly Jon. That decade look back changes dramatically as 2002, 2003, 2004 fall off the counter. I'm not discrediting KF's accomplishments in those years, as they were a great run and thankfully KF built those teams, but they are getting very distant in the rear view mirror.
A play that was made by the defense. Its not like Chappell just threw the ball into Sash's hands. The pressure caused the deflection and Sash was in the right spot at the right time.
Well I think if you look at roughly the same time period I think Iowa's record lines up pretty closely with what the draft numbers indicate. I could be wrong on that though. Iowa has had a lot of good players over the last decade.
Impressive numbers of OL, TE and DB's (mostly safeties). What jumps out is the lack of skill position players (RB, WR, QB), which reinforces what we've known. Iowa has done a very good job of developing talent where development arguably makes the most impact (OL, TE, DL, safety) but it's very difficult to "develop" your way to a NFL-caliber RB, QB or WR.
You might be the only person to think that Stanzi should have played as a RS freshman in 2007. JC was bad but Stanzi wasnt ready.
Who was that other stud DB who played back there with Knight, at that time they thought he might be one of the best in CFB. 96 or 97 ish ?
Who was that other stud DB who played back there with Knight, at that time they thought he might be one of the best in CFB. 96 or 97 ish ?
Damien Robinson.