Best Jobs in College Football

JonDMiller

Publisher/Founder
Athlon’s annual football magazines are hitting the newsstands; I picked up the national edition early Monday morning in West Des Moines at a Kum and Go. I have heard the Big Ten and Big 12 editions can also be found in the Des Moines metro, too.

One of the features this year ranks every college football program with regards to what are the best jobs to have and why…which also sheds light on some of the challenges certain jobs have.

Iowa came in at #30, and said one of the reasons it fared so well was that it was the top school in the state and then said ’sorry, Iowa State’. It talked of it’s solid tradition, even using the word strong, citing five Big Ten titles since 1981 and two BCS bowls since 2003, plus the support from the home crowd. The downsides are things we have talked about here for years; the state doesn’t produce a plethora of high major talent.

The final analysis said that it’s difficult for a school that doesn’t have a strong local recruiting base to compete for national titles, citing Nebraska as an exception.

That’s something I have been saying and writing for years, and something that some fans don’t want to hear, even though it’s a stone cold reality.
Nebraska built a national championship legacy under Bob Devany and advanced it under Tom Osborne. Nebraska’s ridiculous streak of nine or more win seasons (1969-2001) is something we will never see again. Nebraska utilized a unique system during those years, and the longer Osborne was there, the more unique the system became as more and more schools went away from the wishbone. The more success they had, the more they were able to stockpile talent. Success breeds success, and doing it over multiple decades at the level Nebraska performed has enabled them to overcome their inherent local recruiting disadvantages. Nebraska checked in at #17 by the way.

Here is where Athlon rated Big Ten schools ahead of Iowa:

#28 Michigan State
#25 Wisconsin
#11 Penn State
#10 Michigan
#5 Ohio State

Texas was #1, USC #2 and Florida #3. I have no issues with those three at all, and Texas is the easy #1.

With regards to the Big Ten, Michigan State is in a very populous state. Wisconsin also produces more annual BCS level talent than Iowa, as they have more than 5,000,000 people in that state where Iowa is hovering around 3,000,000…their home field environment is also pretty amazing and they have won three Rose Bowls in the last two decades.

The listed ‘cons’ for Michigan (no, not those kind) were interesting..they are ‘old school’ in their thinking, and set in their ways. That may be why Rich Rodriguez is having a tough go, and the article pointed that out.

Ohio State at #5 is solid and seems about right…they had Alabama #4, and I wold probably move Ohio State to #4 and move Alabama down a few pegs.

Iowa State checked in at #70; the only three BCS conference programs rated lower were Wake Forest, Duke and Indiana at 71, 72 and 73.

There is plenty more to read in this item and I found it to be very entertaining and insightful, as I agreed with much of it.

It’s always fun to see the angles these magazines take each year with regards to their feature stories…and it’s great to see that the magazines are starting to hit the newsstands.
 




No, not salaries. Deace and I talked about this today. We both agree with Texas at #1...then feel throw a blanket over USC, Florida and Ohio State...they are in the top tier...next tier is Penn State, Michigan and Notre Dame...after that, Alabama and Oklahoma at 8 and or 9, then we most agreed on Tennessee at 10.
 




The magazine is freakin $8.47!!!! Needed something to read for an overnite sleep apena study, to get me sleepy/tired......my goodness thats a month's worth of gas for my bike.


The local regional recruiting base is legit argument.......I just hate it when people go to that card for every single Iowa loss......Lose to W. Michigan, it must be because of Iowa's recruiting base.....poorly executed play, simply must be Iowa can't recruit with the big boys.


It is a valid argument....I just think people go to that argument way too quick, especially some guys in the media. I swear I think thats Cotlar's favorite argument.
 


No, not salaries. Deace and I talked about this today. We both agree with Texas at #1...then feel throw a blanket over USC, Florida and Ohio State...they are in the top tier...next tier is Penn State, Michigan and Notre Dame...after that, Alabama and Oklahoma at 8 and or 9, then we most agreed on Tennessee at 10.

How do you figure that Alabama is below Penn St?
 


How do you figure that Alabama is below Penn St?

I would guess because Penn State maybe has a more solid recruiting base, outrageous fans, terrific stadium, etc. Alabama is where they're at right now because of Nick Saban. They were pretty down before then.
 


No, not salaries. Deace and I talked about this today. We both agree with Texas at #1...then feel throw a blanket over USC, Florida and Ohio State...they are in the top tier...next tier is Penn State, Michigan and Notre Dame...after that, Alabama and Oklahoma at 8 and or 9, then we most agreed on Tennessee at 10.

I don't agree at all with the Iowa/MSU/Wisconsin thinking, so let's break it down:

1. Stadiums - All 3 are roughly equal, with a slight edge in capacity to Wisconsin, but a slight edge in ambiance and character to Kinnick.

2. Tradition - I define the timeframe for tradition as a generation. Given that, the edge goes to Iowa. During that time, Iowa has won more Big 10 titles and been to more bowl games, both BCS and overall. The only edge goes to Wisconsin for winning more BCS bowls than the other two.

3. Recruiting - Big edge to Michigan State here.

4. Salaries - Big edge to Iowa here.

5. Fan Support - When MSU and Wisky are bad, the fan support just isn't there. Iowa has one of the truly great fan followings in all of college football. Big edge to Iowa here.

I think that, while it's close, Iowa comes out on top as a better job than either Wisky or MSU. I'd rank these three:

1. Iowa
2. Wisky
3. MSU
 


I would guess because Penn State maybe has a more solid recruiting base, outrageous fans, terrific stadium, etc. Alabama is where they're at right now because of Nick Saban. They were pretty down before then.

Saban has done a great job at Alabama but you can make a much better argument that Penn St is only where they are because of Paterno. Alabama has had three coaches win national titles, what happens when Paterno leaves? Also, I would disagree that Penn St. has a better recruiting base or more passionate fans.
 


Saban has done a great job at Alabama but you can make a much better argument that Penn St is only where they are because of Paterno. Alabama has had three coaches win national titles, what happens when Paterno leaves? Also, I would disagree that Penn St. has a better recruiting base or more passionate fans.

That's why I said MAYBE PSU has a better recruiting base (I wasn't being sarcastic, I just wasn't sure. I also was referring to in-state recruiting). And I also realize that Paterno is why PSU is where they are, and that 'Bama has won titles under 3 different coaches. But look at those coaches. Stallings was pretty good, and Bryant/Saban are/will go down as coaching legends.

One other thing to maybe consider: 'Bama has the stain of cheating on its record, while PSU does not. I don't know if that made any difference when this list was created, I'm just throwing it out there.
 






Top