for the following reasons:
1. His in-game coaching is much better than either of those two. It's obvious he knows the right buttons to push and how to handle match-ups and mismatches.
2. He is a much more "player friendly" coach. His players love him, he obviously knows how to assemble a TEAM of players that like each other and want to play for him and their teammates. He is definitely more of a "Leader of Men", than either of those two put together.
3. His OFFENSIVE style is not as deliberate as some might think. Sure, he's a defense first coach (because defense wins championships), but he knows how to mix it up offensively. I like how he uses big men (as opposed to having them 25 feet from the basket setting screens), I like how he'll spread the court and allow the point guard to dribble drive and then dish. He'll give the players freedom to fast break when it's there, but not to push it at all costs.
4. He actually understands how to break a press.....I'm still convinced Lickliter is incapable of figuring out how to do that.
Having said all that, though, I don't think there's any way he gets hired unless all the other "splash" hires turn us down. Between McD, Lickliter and Alford, I think Barta would get run out of town on a rail if he hired Ben. However, I do get tired of people just spouting off and dismissing him (Jon, this includes you) because of pre-conceived notions you might have about the man. And please, stop with the "If Jacobsen's the best we can do, we should have kept Lickliter". Lickliter would have had a player mutiny on his hands had we kept him.
Bottom line is that there's more to being a good coach than just knowing basketball.....I have no doubt that Todd and Greg have forgotten more about basketball than I'll ever know, but I still think Ben is 10 times the COACH than either of them are.