I agree that OSU always has bounce-back potential with the talent in their state.
And this year,they probably will still win the Leaders. I just think that when the real sanctions do hit,they could be relatively weaker,which will probably bring them back to the pack a bit.
I did not like the non-geographical split of the divisions,but I have no issues with the naming of the divisions....east/west did not make any sense anymore,and I do think the Leaders/Legends monikers have far more marketing potential than Blue/Gray or Lakes/Plains..ect.
I am always surprised at how some fans really get exercised about the logo and the division names...who really cares?
For those who are struggling:
Leaders: OSU,Wis.,PSU,IU,PU,Ill.
Legends: Iowa,Minn,Mich.MSU,NW,Neb.
If that is too much to remember,just use this...Iowa and the M & N schools are Legends, the rest are Leaders. One little thing I do like,Iowa is always listed first as they go alphabetical....right where we belong.
And this year,they probably will still win the Leaders. I just think that when the real sanctions do hit,they could be relatively weaker,which will probably bring them back to the pack a bit.
I did not like the non-geographical split of the divisions,but I have no issues with the naming of the divisions....east/west did not make any sense anymore,and I do think the Leaders/Legends monikers have far more marketing potential than Blue/Gray or Lakes/Plains..ect.
I am always surprised at how some fans really get exercised about the logo and the division names...who really cares?
For those who are struggling:
Leaders: OSU,Wis.,PSU,IU,PU,Ill.
Legends: Iowa,Minn,Mich.MSU,NW,Neb.
If that is too much to remember,just use this...Iowa and the M & N schools are Legends, the rest are Leaders. One little thing I do like,Iowa is always listed first as they go alphabetical....right where we belong.