NeilDiamond
Well-Known Member
This could be a real case study on many, many levels. The most obvious being that you have a coach at AU that is going to get canned 2 (TWO) years after winning a NC, a feat that had not been accomplished in forever on The Plains. The message is pretty simple there. We pay you to win every year. If you don't, you are gone. Buyouts be damned.
Then you have the situation in Iowa City where the coach is in the midst of three years of ineptitude, with each year worse than the last. Yet, its pretty much a foregone conclusion that short of being charged with a felony or quitting, the guy is going to continue to just plod along, cashing checks and coaching like its an unfortunate obligation to his decedents.
I suppose arguments can be made for either side: Loyalty and stablity vs. The desire to win and hold coaches accountable. While I think Auburn is a cesspool, I do envy their willingness to pull the trigger in these situations, as will be done shortly.
Then you have the situation in Iowa City where the coach is in the midst of three years of ineptitude, with each year worse than the last. Yet, its pretty much a foregone conclusion that short of being charged with a felony or quitting, the guy is going to continue to just plod along, cashing checks and coaching like its an unfortunate obligation to his decedents.
I suppose arguments can be made for either side: Loyalty and stablity vs. The desire to win and hold coaches accountable. While I think Auburn is a cesspool, I do envy their willingness to pull the trigger in these situations, as will be done shortly.