racerhawk
Well-Known Member
On another note, I think it is interesting that every instance of discrimination against gays is labeled "homophobia." We don't call sexism "femaphobia" or racism "Afrophobia " or perhaps "Latinophobia."
Now, when people say they don't want to take showers in the locker room with someone who might be attracted to them, that is "homophobia." But how is that different than someone who reacts out of fear when they encounter someone from another race? But we don 't use fear term in this instance.
The ism suffix is commonly used to indicate an ideology based on superiority. Well, when someone reacts out of fear when encountering someone from another group, they mark the other group as having the power to harm, hence the phobia suffix is appropriate. But when someone has simply marked another group as deficient then the ism suffix would seem more appropriate.
It's not an issue of political correctness, but specificity. Having people be clear about why they react to others differently in certain situations may help us be more thoughtful in our actions and understandings. What would happen if we just asked ourselves when we met someone and had an urge to treat that person with disdain, "Do I feel this way because I feel superior or am I afraid, or perhaps both?
Yeah. We don't call the 2 yard pass into the dirt on 3rd down "davisophobia" now do we?