eveningnewsteam
Well-Known Member
I'm still wondering how KF kept his job after 2014. Not another place in the country would he have been retained
lol never said "exclusively" target 2 star recruits. If 2 star recruits fit a successful scheme, then fine. Targeting 2* recruits doesn't mean you CAN'T target other recruits, not sure if you're aware of that. doesn't sound like you are, might want to inform yourself better
I'm SICK OF THESE THREADS!!!! "Well, at least we aren't so and so".....who give a rats ass....it has not ONE THING to do with Iowa's lot in life!!!! Don't bring that S around here, because it will get swatted to half court!!!
The difference between Iowa and Michigan State is that Dantonio will "move on" to another school at the end of the year (read: he'll be told to leave) because MSU is a big-boy program. Since we're justIowa, nothing will change.
When you post something of value, I will post something more intelligent. But I'm not optimistic.
That would be stupid to do. If Dantonio leaves, it's because other teams are willing to pay him big to get him.
I don't see you making any constructive criticisms, scooter. I understand many were calling for his head, and I wasn't one of them. Iowa can't... can not fire Ferentz no matter what you want. Barta took care of that with a bad decision, however I do believe in give him some time to build off the foundation he has laid.
I was talking with someone the other day, and I agree with the idea that Ferentz needs to look into hiring an OC with some NFL background, as obviously, the pro-style attack works for many teams in the NFL.
Going off like a blathering idiot doesn't help anyone, aside from maybe yourself. It stirs the pot and makes the entire fan base look idiotic.
Furthermore, I'm not certain why you think that your actions are the reason that Iowa has ever improved. Really? Get over yourself. If there is anything that is common in Coaches is the desire to win, if Ferentz were making decisions based on the fan base KOK would have been let go year before he was, and GD would not have been around for last years run.
So you don't honestly thing that Iowa recruiting is better, this year and last, that the previous 4 years? Why is having more talent not a reason to be optimistic? Some of their practices were in an F'ing INFLATABLE BUBBLE.
Or it's because coaches get old and can't recruit or motivate teenagers any more, and they take lesser jobs in the twilights of their career, and good programs know and accept it. It's not stupid--it's big-boy college football.
justIowa does not play big-boy college football.
If you think the offensive coordinators are the problem, nobody on this board is going to be able to help you out because you obviously don't get what the problem is.
And using your line of thinking, no school should ever fire their coach because they might end up worse off. I'm glad the Cubs didn't listen to stupidity like that. Or Michigan, or Oklahoma or Iowa basketball before we hired Fran, etc.
Being afraid to fire an underperforming and lost coach is a losers mentality and that's where we are at currently with Iowa football.
What? I thought all we needed was 4* recruits and we would be automatic winners!
ND 55 (4* or 5*) players signed from '13-'16
MSU
MSU has lost to Maryland, Illinois, and Indiana.......MSU has beaten a joke of a ND team and freaking Furman. They are bad, really, really bad. NDSU probably beats MSU by 2 TD.
Let's just see how this recruiting class plays out. Right now we aren't going to be on Iowa states level the way this season is turning. But you can tell yourself we've had good classes. They've been so good in fact that none of them have seen the field despite how horrible the guys in front of them are. Solid recruiting though!
This times a gazillionThey have no QB or RB. Thus they can't move the ball, thus they can't control the game, this their D gets tired, and they lose.
Sounds familiar, except that for MSU, that's an anomaly that I'm sure they will fix in recruiting this year. At least they are trying.
Iowa on depth and talent -- "the cavalry's not coming".
It really comes down to if you belive in this axioms:
1. 5* players are rated such because of their skill level. They are farther along in their progression as football players than their peers at their position.
2. It is easier to win football games if your team is skilled at football.
If you have 55 5 * players and one of them doesn't work out, you have a better chance of replacing him with a good player from the other 54 5*s. Thus your skill level stays high and is easier to win games.
If you have 0 5* and one diamond in the rough walk-on/low-level recruit (like Jewell or Tevaun Smith) and the next man in is a diamond n the rough who hasn't been cut yet you have less skilled players and it is atder to win.
The thing is our coach acknowledges this. He calls it margin for error. He says it's small at Iowa. The logical thing to do is increase the margin for error. He won't, because he's a bad recruiter.
The other thing is that the recruit ratings matter -- the teams that consistently recruit well win more often than teams that do not.
Last night our four years of 85 scholarship players got roasted by a team with 81 schollies of only 2 years. That means their coach has developed their payers to 3.5 times the skill of Iowa players in half of the time that Ferentz has had to develop is players, with fewer players to work with.
So either the Ferentz is a bad coach because he doesn't develop players quickly enough, or he's a bad coach because he doesn't start with players skilled enough to develop in a competitive time period (before they graduate).
Here's the other thing: recruiting the way Ferentz does - by largely ignoring recruiting ranking - is like trying to beat the market. The efficient market hypothesis states that it is impossible to do this consistently, and any period in which you do beat the market is pure chance. Iowa has five really good years out of 19. Ferentz beat the market by chance those years with good players that were rated low.
I'll try again. Iowa has enough money with the BIG conference money to do what it wants. And if it wants to fire KF, it can. It would be painful from a money perspective but it can be done. If I were the AD id tell him he can't get blown out against UM and he has to win 2 of the last three plus the bowl game or he's out. Period. We need to start expecting more and creating a culture of winning.I'll try again, and I'm not sure how you missed it last time, but Iowa CAN NOT fire Ferentz. Like, they can't afford to with the buyout, even if it were a good idea. How is not being able to afford to do something a losers mentality.
So tell me, what do we do?