I think the stigma on Paterno way back to 1998, is that he was following the case closely. He had already forced out Sandusky (the million dollar question is why) though he later allowed Sandusky to coach the 1999 season under a 90 day extension agreement. What is so troubling is that having followed the case closely, Paterno then still allowed Sandusky to bring children to PSU facilities.
To follow up on some other points - the counselor (Seasock), that said Sandusky was not displaying signs of pedophile behavior, was not even licensed at the time he did his analysis. They used his analysis to override the analysis of the doctor who said Sandusky did show signs of being a pedophile. Some wonder now if he was a ringer for the University and Second Mile.
The Chief of Police, Harmon, was keeping top PSU officials up to date on the 1998 case. He notified them he was able to keep the matter out of the logbook thus keeping the allegations from becoming public knowledge - coverup?
It standard operating procedure in 1998 was to notify the state of any allegations of pedophilia. This was also not done in this instance - coverup?
thanks for the rational response. To some fans,if you simply ask questions about the evidence,you are endorsing child rape.
Some good points made here.
Not sure about the specifics of Sandusky's ''retirement'' from PSU.
Or the non-licensed therapist. News to me.
I go back to the Chief of Police tho....shouldnt he be brought up on charges of covering up and not complying with the reporting requirements? Seems to me that there is a whole host of guilty parties who have not been arrested yet. Is that gonna happen? If not,why?