Rawkhawk73
Banned
A couple of points after reading these posts:
1. The .613 winning percentage at Iowa over the past 32 years is because of the unique abilities of Fry and Ferentz. It is no guarantee that we will win at this pace over the next 32 years. Michigan is discovering that past success is no guarantee of future performance.
1. There is no real national championship in college football. It is a mythical national championship. Iowa won a mythical national championship in 1958. Making the national championship game involves a lot of luck, favorable scheduling, and politics. Until there is a legitimate playoff that is determined on the field (like the NFL), whining about national championships is just a waste of energy. If there had been an 8 or 16 team playoff over the past 32 years, I believe Iowa might have won another national championship. The current system gives Iowa almost no chance at all (I believe that if Iowa had gone 12-0 in 2009, they still would have been denied the opportunity to play in the final title game).
But somehow, all those other teams on the list, EXCEPT IOWA, managed to have luck or the breaks go their way? C'mon man, you're smarter than that.
Look, there's nothing wrong with saying that Iowa, with it's history over the last generation of winning games, bringing in money and producing NFL players at a rate eclipsed by only a small group of programs, should have won a national championship (or at least played for one) during that time. It's not a freaking indictment on the program or an indictment of any one person. It's simply a fact to say that only 1 program in the United States has had top level success over the last generation but no National Championship chances to show for it. It's more of a bummer than anything else.