okeefe4prez
Well-Known Member
Such as...?
Jon Scheyer. How the heck does Scheyer turn down Northwestern, which is just down the road from his hometown of Northbrook, for Duke? It makes no sense. It would be like if Glen Worley had gone to Duke.
Such as...?
He averaged 17 pts and 8 rebounds per game for the T-wolves. That's a draft miss?I doubt they'll say much about Laettners pro career but it's safe to say he was one of many misses the Timberwolves have had in drafting players.
Well you're missing the point of this thread then. And Hill proved he couldn't win one without Laettner either.
He averaged 17 pts and 8 rebounds per game for the T-wolves. That's a draft miss?
He was the 3rd pick. And if you look at the picks after him in that draft (other than maybe Jimmy Jackson), it's hard to say they made a bad choice.Depends on what you want out of the 2nd pick in the draft. You want a franchise hof'er or an above average player who will give you long time production.
He was the 3rd pick. And if you look at the picks after him in that draft (other than maybe Jimmy Jackson), it's hard to say they made a bad choice.
This feels like a Jordan/Pippen debate. Pippen never got a title those 2 years Jordan was gone, but it is/was an unfair comparison because Jordan never played without Pippen. I think the same thing applies here.
WHAT? "Jordan never played without Pippen"? Really? Jordan was drafted in 1984; Pippen in 1987. There's three seasons that Jordan played without Pippen. And he scored a lot of points in those three seasons but didn't win a playoff series, in fact the Bulls only won one playoff game in those first three seasons. The best the Bulls did with only Jordan was 40 wins in a season. The first year with Pippen had them winning 50 games and they got to the second round of the NBA playoffs. And they had all-stars with Jordan his first three years, namely Oakley and Woolridge. Also, Corzine was a very capable center at the time.
I would expect the 3rd overall draft pick to be an all star. Laettner made 1 all star team in 13 years and it was after he left Minnesota.He averaged 17 pts and 8 rebounds per game for the T-wolves. That's a draft miss?
Again, it was a weak draft. If you are going to say it was a "miss" for the T-Wolves, you have to identify players that were drafted after Laettner that were clearly better. Maybe Jackson, but other than that no one jumps out.I would expect the 3rd overall draft pick to be an all star. Laettner made 1 all star team in 13 years and it was after he left Minnesota.
Again, it was a weak draft. If you are going to say it was a "miss" for the T-Wolves, you have to identify players that were drafted after Laettner that were clearly better. Maybe Jackson, but other than that no one jumps out.
Not every class is going to have a HOFer in it... He played like 13 years and made 50 million bucks or more I'm sure. Nobody can say he's Kwame Brown or anything close to that. He was a solid NBA player for years and a HOFer in terms of what he did in college. I see why he's hated by KY fans yet I respect his game. He could play ball. He and Bobby Hurley were the leaders of that team. Hill being younger did defer to them. He was a good player in his own right no doubt but Duke doesn't get to the final 4 all those times without Laettner and that's a fact.Depends on what you want out of the 2nd pick in the draft. You want a franchise hof'er or an above average player who will give you long time production.
Correct. Which is why they were correctly selected before Laettner. The overall 1st round, however, was pretty weak.I wouldn't consider Shaq/Mourning weak.
You're kind of reinforcing my original point that Laettner was not a "miss". Ellis/Gugliotta were arguably SIMILAR to Laettner, but not defnitively better. In order for Laettner to be a miss, I would say he would have to have been a complete bust or there were several selected after him that were much better.You would have gotten similar production out of Ellis/Gugliotta that you got out of Laettner and both guys were drafted after Laettner.
I'm not arguing who was a better college player. I'm arguing who is a better basketball player period. Duke never wins those championships in 1991 & 1992 without Hill. He was their best and most athletic player who could play & guard 4 positions well. They needed him to beat the the UNLV/Kansas/Indiana/Michigan type teams. Hill & Duke did have an early exit in 1993 tournament. Of course the next year, Hill's SR season, he carried Duke to the National Championship game against Arkansas and lost on Scotty Thurman's rainbow 3.