2012 Game by Game predictions

Almost every unit in 2012 will be better imo than the 2011 version. There is no need to even debate that OL, TEs, QB, LBs, and DBs will be better. That leaves DL, RB, and WR -- imo these spots also will be improved/better due a synergistic (yes, I said that) combination of personnel and schemes.

If any *one* of the following were to happen, that should be enough to cement 9 wins in the regular season:

(1) Vandenberg elevates his mental game against the blitz to average level (basically doesn't panic as long as protection is holding).
(2) 4 of 5 top Linebackers stay healthy
(3) Alvis and C.Davis are both healthy enough to contribute

If 2 or more of the above materialize, the possibilities are tantalizing. We definitely have weak links but we also have experience (with said weak links) to build upon.

Other thoughts:

This year I expect that Iowa won't suffer from the effects of lop-sided TOPs. The combination of a good OL, decent tight-ends, a senior QB and Davis' schemes (from what I can surmise from his interviews) will do the trick on offense. An aggressive scheme will concomitantly keep the D from prolonged exposure -- we will give up big plays occasionally but on the positive we won't wear down either.

Add to this, as another poster stated, if Garmon comes in strong. Having the backfield as a strength on D vs the DL is unique for Iowa. The opposite was true in the Brad Banks year and we did OK on D. If the DL comes in a little better than expected, the D could be unexpectedly strong.

Sure, if there are no improvements this year, 7-5 is certainly the realistic prediction. However, how often is there no improvement on an Iowa team without key injuries during the season? This staff is too education oriented to allow that. There is a laundry list of improvements above that could make a difference and any of them are certainly possible. The sticking point is, of course, no key in-season injuries. Barring that, we'll do better than 7-5 for the regular season.
 
Putin-Medvedev-he-mad.jpg

Not joining the fray, here but have to say, that pic+caption is the best in a while! Actually signed off, kept chuckling, and compelled to get back on just to post this.

As an objective, casual observer watching the ****-fight unfold, gotta say,
Ghost - 1
nick - 0.
 
Sometimes I wonder if people on this site actually root for the Hawkeyes, or wish for them to fail.
 
Almost every unit in 2012 will be better imo than the 2011 version. There is no need to even debate that OL,

Why can that not be questioned? There have been times our OL hasn't looked steller, we lose a 1st round LT and a Solid RT and a lot of "new" faces on the OL. Until the positions are set in stone the OL to me is still questionable. All because it is a position of strength doesn't mean it can never have a down year.

The only positions that could truly be argued without question should be the D-backs, LBs and TEs.

For game experience, the weakest positions right now are DL, RB, and OL.
 
Why is everyone assuming Iowa beats Iowa State? They beat us last season and are a better team this season. Probably one of the better defenses we'll see and their offense will cause problems with our defense playing only 2nd game.
 
Why is everyone assuming Iowa beats Iowa State? They beat us last season and are a better team this season. Probably one of the better defenses we'll see and their offense will cause problems with our defense playing only 2nd game.

Because it is at home. I think Iowa should be able to run on them because their Dline is not that good. Additionally they lost Johnson at corner and I believe he is being replaced with another CB the size of Reeves, like 5'8. Vandenberg will be improved and is always better at home.


Should be able to force Jantz or Barnett into some turnovers if they really are going to play a little more aggressive this year.
 
First four games: 3-1 vs. Northern Illinois, Iowa State, UNI, Central Michigan
Lower tier Big Ten teams: 2-1 vs. Minnesota, Northwestern, Indiana
Middle of the pack: 1-1 vs. Penn State & Purdue
Better Big Ten teams: 1-2 vs. Michigan, Nebraska, Michigan State

Team starts out very shaky but the competition isn’t so great either. Team improves gradually but so does the opposition.

Injuries are the wild card. This team is very inexperienced and very thin. A few key injuries could turn a 7-8 win season into a 5-6 win season. It's a lot more likely things go down from 7-8 wins than up.
 
First four games: 3-1 vs. Northern Illinois, Iowa State, UNI, Central Michigan
Lower tier Big Ten teams: 2-1 vs. Minnesota, Northwestern, Indiana
Middle of the pack: 1-1 vs. Penn State & Purdue
Better Big Ten teams: 1-2 vs. Michigan, Nebraska, Michigan State

Team starts out very shaky but the competition isn’t so great either. Team improves gradually but so does the opposition.

Injuries are the wild card. This team is very inexperienced and very thin. A few key injuries could turn a 7-8 win season into a 5-6 win season. It's a lot more likely things go down from 7-8 wins than up.

Something in this ballpark
I;m not ready to go by game yet but we will win one we shouldn't and lose one or two we shouldn't.
We win 6-8 games (probably 7) and most likely are bowling in Texas.
 
First four games: 3-1 vs. Northern Illinois, Iowa State, UNI, Central MichiganLower tier Big Ten teams: 2-1 vs. Minnesota, Northwestern, Indiana Middle of the pack: 1-1 vs. Penn State & PurdueBetter Big Ten teams: 1-2 vs. Michigan, Nebraska, Michigan StateTeam starts out very shaky but the competition isn�t so great either. Team improves gradually but so does the opposition.Injuries are the wild card. This team is very inexperienced and very thin. A few key injuries could turn a 7-8 win season into a 5-6 win season. It's a lot more likely things go down from 7-8 wins than up.
Something in this ballparkI;m not ready to go by game yet but we will win one we shouldn't and lose one or two we shouldn't.We win 6-8 games (probably 7) and most likely are bowling in Texas.
Exactly. The Hawks will lose at least one they shouldn't in the first 5 games.
 
Why is everyone assuming Iowa beats Iowa State? They beat us last season and are a better team this season. Probably one of the better defenses we'll see and their offense will cause problems with our defense playing only 2nd game.
Best line-backing core we shall see all season IMO.
 
Best line-backing core we shall see all season IMO.

Yes, they have linebackers. They lost big parts of their DLine and defensive backfield however. Anybody remember how effective Greenway and Hodge were in 05 when they had a young DLine? Same thing for ISU in 2012.
 
Last I checked Klien/Knott do not play QB....Rhoads hasn't made too many mistakes since he has been there, but pulling Barnett in the bowl game might have been one now he has 2 QB(s) looking over their shoulder.
 
If we win 7 games, it's because we start the season 5-0. I don't see a lot of scenarios in which we finish better than 2-5.
 

Latest posts

Top