Almost every unit in 2012 will be better imo than the 2011 version. There is no need to even debate that OL, TEs, QB, LBs, and DBs will be better. That leaves DL, RB, and WR -- imo these spots also will be improved/better due a synergistic (yes, I said that) combination of personnel and schemes.
If any *one* of the following were to happen, that should be enough to cement 9 wins in the regular season:
(1) Vandenberg elevates his mental game against the blitz to average level (basically doesn't panic as long as protection is holding).
(2) 4 of 5 top Linebackers stay healthy
(3) Alvis and C.Davis are both healthy enough to contribute
If 2 or more of the above materialize, the possibilities are tantalizing. We definitely have weak links but we also have experience (with said weak links) to build upon.
Other thoughts:
This year I expect that Iowa won't suffer from the effects of lop-sided TOPs. The combination of a good OL, decent tight-ends, a senior QB and Davis' schemes (from what I can surmise from his interviews) will do the trick on offense. An aggressive scheme will concomitantly keep the D from prolonged exposure -- we will give up big plays occasionally but on the positive we won't wear down either.
Sometimes I wonder if people on this site actually root for the Hawkeyes, or wish for them to fail.
Almost every unit in 2012 will be better imo than the 2011 version. There is no need to even debate that OL,
I don't see the PSU or Nebby wins with this defense. Both are run oriented offenses and our D is going to better suited to fight the pass this year, but not the run.
Why is everyone assuming Iowa beats Iowa State? They beat us last season and are a better team this season. Probably one of the better defenses we'll see and their offense will cause problems with our defense playing only 2nd game.
Last time I checked, none of us here have seen this defense play.
First four games: 3-1 vs. Northern Illinois, Iowa State, UNI, Central Michigan
Lower tier Big Ten teams: 2-1 vs. Minnesota, Northwestern, Indiana
Middle of the pack: 1-1 vs. Penn State & Purdue
Better Big Ten teams: 1-2 vs. Michigan, Nebraska, Michigan State
Team starts out very shaky but the competition isn’t so great either. Team improves gradually but so does the opposition.
Injuries are the wild card. This team is very inexperienced and very thin. A few key injuries could turn a 7-8 win season into a 5-6 win season. It's a lot more likely things go down from 7-8 wins than up.
Exactly. The Hawks will lose at least one they shouldn't in the first 5 games.Something in this ballparkI;m not ready to go by game yet but we will win one we shouldn't and lose one or two we shouldn't.We win 6-8 games (probably 7) and most likely are bowling in Texas.First four games: 3-1 vs. Northern Illinois, Iowa State, UNI, Central MichiganLower tier Big Ten teams: 2-1 vs. Minnesota, Northwestern, Indiana Middle of the pack: 1-1 vs. Penn State & PurdueBetter Big Ten teams: 1-2 vs. Michigan, Nebraska, Michigan StateTeam starts out very shaky but the competition isn�t so great either. Team improves gradually but so does the opposition.Injuries are the wild card. This team is very inexperienced and very thin. A few key injuries could turn a 7-8 win season into a 5-6 win season. It's a lot more likely things go down from 7-8 wins than up.
Best line-backing core we shall see all season IMO.Why is everyone assuming Iowa beats Iowa State? They beat us last season and are a better team this season. Probably one of the better defenses we'll see and their offense will cause problems with our defense playing only 2nd game.
Best line-backing core we shall see all season IMO.
If we win 7 games, it's because we start the season 5-0. I don't see a lot of scenarios in which we finish better than 2-5.