11/12: My B1G Power Rankings

JonDMiller

Publisher/Founder
This week's edition of our Power Rankings shows a few changes from last week, namely Michigan moving down a few notches. These rankings are based on who I believe is playing the best basketball based on what they have done this year and as of late. The number in parenthesis is where they teams ranked in Ken Pomeroy's rankings at the time this article was written (5:30am on November 21st)


1. Michigan State (6): Despite a pair of lackluster wins this week, they still beat Kentucky in convincing fashion, they are ranked #1 and therefore there is no controversy here.
2. Wisconsin (17): They scored 103 points two nights ago and Frank Kaminsky scored a school record 43 points in the game? He was 16-19 from the floor including 6-6 from three. He did this in 28 minutes of action as the Badgers were spanking the U of North Dakota.
3. Ohio State (3): Lackluster win at home against Morgan State and so far this year they've taken over the mantle of Big Ten's most boring team to watch from Wisconsin. That said, they did win at Marquette this past week, a Marquette team ranked 17th and held them to just 35 points. Ohio State scored just 52 themselves, but that's one of the best resume wins of the season for a Big Ten team to this point.
4. Iowa (19): Dev Marble scored 27 in 20 minutes the other night..he was on pace to score 38 points if he played 28 minutes...but I digress. The Hawkeyes have destroyed the teams on their slate, which is what you'd hope they do. The tests begin next week when six of their next seven games come against teams in the Ken Pomeroy Top 150, five of those likely being teams ranked in the top 50.
5. Michigan (18): Losing at Iowa State is no shame as the Cyclones appear to be a legit Top 25 team already this season, especially after their win at BYU. The Wolverines had Trey Burke to rely on late in games last year, or Tim Hardaway Jr. Those two are gone and Michigan looked a bit lost late in the game at Hilton on Sunday. They have talent, but do they have a closer? Not yet.
6. Indiana (31): Like Iowa, the Hoosiers have feasted on easy pickings for the most part. They beat Long Island University by one point at home a few weeks back, but it's better than a loss. This team will be up and down this year but should finish around .500 in the league.
7. Minnesota (22): At this point, they are here. Once we get into the Big Ten, I think their guard-oriented strength is going to create some problems and they will finish on the south side of .500 in the league.
8. Illinois (36): Inexperienced team who looks more explosive than Purdue at this time. Don't think they'll put enough together for an NCAA bid this year.
9. Purdue (65): The Boilermakers have a chance to move up, but their fortunes will rise and fall with the attitude of center AJ Hammonds.
10. Nebraska (72): I am rooting for UMass to beat Nebraska because I don't want to be in the position of pulling for a Craig Neal coached New Mexico team over Nebraska on Friday. I like Nebraska coach Tim Miles. Their faux Hoops fans? Generally speaking, not so much.
11. Penn State (89): Another guard dominated team, Frazier and Newbill are a pretty exciting tandem. They'll beat some B1G teams they shouldn't beat, at home. Then again when you are slotted this low in the Power Rankings, any win is one you shouldn't get.
12. Northwestern (87): Losing to Illinois State was bad. Chris Collins transitions them away from the Princeton offense to real basketball and the move is going to be painful for a while until Northwestern can recruit (and sign) players who fit the motion scheme better. This will be the big challenge; can they land that type of player and still maintain their academic standards?


Lastly, how how that ACC, the self professed best conference in college basketball history this year with its new editions? NC State loses to NC Central while Georgia Tech loses to Dayton. Boston College has already lost to Providence, UMass and Toledo, Maryland has lost to UConn and Oregon State and North Carolina lost a home game to Belmont. North Carolina is playing a couple players down as they are held out due to NCAA eligibility concerns, including their leading scorer. Miami began the year losing to St Francis and Virginia Tech lost to something called USC Upstate to start the year. Duke lost to Kansas, which is certainly respectable, but ACC coaches were the ones saying these things about their league.


LAST WEEK'S RANKINGS
1. Michigan State
2. Michigan
3. Wisconsin
4. Iowa
5. Ohio State
6. Indiana
7. Illinois
8. Minnesota
9. Nebraska
10. Purdue
11. Northwestern
12. Penn State
 
Jon, quit trolling us! To early to be switching dates around on us, you made me check my calendar.

:D
 
I thought the SEC was the strongest conference in basketball? At least that's what Tony Barbee said on the heels of his 9-23 season. How are they doing so far? 35-10, Big Ten is 42-4, ACC is 42-14.
 
How is Iowa at #4?? I just don't see it YET. They have proven nothing to me other than feasting on cupcakes. They struggled with one at that too. Iowa still lacks a dynamic player that can be the difference maker in clutch time. Iowa lost a bunch of close games because of a lack of one last year and that wasn't addressed this year or 2014 either. Iowa does have depth but doesn't mean they have talent though. I'm still in "prove it to me" mode with Iowa basketball. Right now this team still feels and looks like last year's bubble team.
 
How is Iowa at #4?? I just don't see it YET. They have proven nothing to me other than feasting on cupcakes. They struggled with one at that too. Iowa still lacks a dynamic player that can be the difference maker in clutch time. Iowa lost a bunch of close games because of a lack of one last year and that wasn't addressed this year or 2014 either. Iowa does have depth but doesn't mean they have talent though. I'm still in "prove it to me" mode with Iowa basketball. Right now this team still feels and looks like last year's bubble team.

Name me a team below them that has proven something either.
 
How is Iowa at #4?? I just don't see it YET. They have proven nothing to me other than feasting on cupcakes. They struggled with one at that too. Iowa still lacks a dynamic player that can be the difference maker in clutch time. Iowa lost a bunch of close games because of a lack of one last year and that wasn't addressed this year or 2014 either. Iowa does have depth but doesn't mean they have talent though. I'm still in "prove it to me" mode with Iowa basketball. Right now this team still feels and looks like last year's bubble team.

Then make your own rankings.

Iowa does not have to prove anything to YOU, I get tired of this attitude you carry that the Iowa basketball program owes you anything. You moan about everything, the players Fran has brought here is the best he could have possibly gotten considering the circumstances and he is the best in game coach Iowa has had since Mr. Davis. It is what it is and if you don't like it then find another team to root for or complain about (whatever).
 
Name me a team below them that has proven something either.

I'd put Indiana and Michigan above them. Those teams have better talent than Iowa. Michigan has gone out and actually played a Top 25 team in ISU on the road, maybe even top 10 caliber ISU team. Indiana is still undefeated and even struggled with inferior team like Iowa has but still more talented. Basketball is all about talent and difference makers. Look at PSU even with Frazier how much better they are. Frazier is on Iowa, the Hawkeyes are a Big Ten title contender.

If Iowa goes out and looks good in the Bahamas then I'll be a believer but if they struggle against Xavier and get beat then those cupcake games did no good and won't buy into the hype.
 
ISU is not top 10 caliber, maybe top 25. IA will do their job in Atlantis and in Ames. Count on it.
 
I'd put Indiana and Michigan above them. Those teams have better talent than Iowa. Michigan has gone out and actually played a Top 25 team in ISU on the road, maybe even top 10 caliber ISU team. Indiana is still undefeated and even struggled with inferior team like Iowa has but still more talented. Basketball is all about talent and difference makers. Look at PSU even with Frazier how much better they are. Frazier is on Iowa, the Hawkeyes are a Big Ten title contender.

If Iowa goes out and looks good in the Bahamas then I'll be a believer but if they struggle against Xavier and get beat then those cupcake games did no good and won't buy into the hype.

They've played a top 25 team on the road and lost. So not sure what they prove by losing. Indiana only beat LIU-Brooklyn by one and yet you want to put them ahead of us because they have more talent? Well they should be ahead of Wisconsin then too, because they have more "talent" than Wisconsin too. Hell why even play the season, let's just base the standings on recruiting rankings. Oh and Penn St lost to Bucknell, they aren't much better.
 
Then make your own rankings.

Iowa does not have to prove anything to YOU, I get tired of this attitude you carry that the Iowa basketball program owes you anything. You moan about everything, the players Fran has brought here is the best he could have possibly gotten considering the circumstances and he is the best in game coach Iowa has had since Mr. Davis. It is what it is and if you don't like it then find another team to root for or complain about (whatever).

Fran has missed on recruiting. If there is a flaw in Fran it's his recruiting so far. If he lands a difference maker this Iowa team is scary good. I look at ISU and the transfer thing and it's worked big time for them. I wish Fran would land a transfer like White or Kane or Clyburn. It could really make the difference for Iowa.

Iowa has played the 5th EASIEST in the COUNTRY! When they start upping the competition and beating them, then they are legit.

Look, Iowa is going to be good but I don't know that they'll be much better than they were last year. Iowa's a tourney team though.
 
Last edited:
Fran has missed on recruiting. If there is a flaw in Fran it's his recruiting so far. If he lands a difference maker this Iowa team is scary good. I look at ISU and the transfer thing and it's worked big time for them. I wish Fran would land a transfer like White or Kane or Clyburn. It could really make the difference for Iowa.

How the heck do you get those transfers to come to Iowa after the mess Lick left? Please tell me how Fran is supposed to sell that? I think with what he was given his recruiting has been outstanding. The recruiting job he did on Gesell was incredible, when Fran first got here Gesell had very little interest in coming to Iowa. Plus I seriously doubt Woodbury would have came to Iowa if Lick was still coaching Iowa at the time.

You see the transfers Iowa State has gotten, but what magical words would have made them come to Iowa? I believe a few of them transfered from another Big Ten school, so now you have to sell them on coming to Iowa AND paying their own way?

Iowa is what it is, a basketball program building towards respectability. If you would get your head out of the sand in Ames perhaps you would realize that.
 
Fran has missed on recruiting. If there is a flaw in Fran it's his recruiting so far. If he lands a difference maker this Iowa team is scary good. I look at ISU and the transfer thing and it's worked big time for them. I wish Fran would land a transfer like White or Kane or Clyburn. It could really make the difference for Iowa.

Iowa has played the 5th EASIEST in the COUNTRY! When they start upping the competition and beating them, then they are legit.

Look, Iowa is going to be good but I don't know that they'll be much better than they were last year. Iowa's a tourney team though.

Why do they have to beat them? By your logic used for Michigan all they have to do is play them and that is enough to win you over.
 
ISU is not top 10 caliber, maybe top 25. IA will do their job in Atlantis and in Ames. Count on it.

I'd say ISU is a legit Top 15 team at this point. They've challenged themselves in the non-con and won a tough game against a quality opponent in BYU last night. They are more than a fringe Top 25 team.

That's good for Iowa though. Helps SOS and gives Iowa a lot of attention if they can win @hilton
 
Fran has missed on recruiting. If there is a flaw in Fran it's his recruiting so far. If he lands a difference maker this Iowa team is scary good. I look at ISU and the transfer thing and it's worked big time for them. I wish Fran would land a transfer like White or Kane or Clyburn. It could really make the difference for Iowa.

Iowa has played the 5th EASIEST in the COUNTRY! When they start upping the competition and beating them, then they are legit.

Look, Iowa is going to be good but I don't know that they'll be much better than they were last year. Iowa's a tourney team though.

WTF are you talking about? Good God! Every single player on this team was brought in by Fran. Those players have been talented enough to get to an NIT championship last year while winning 25 games and those same players have gotten us our first Top 25 ranking in 7 years. I don't give a sh!t what ISU is bringing in. We aren't competing against them for B1G championships and NCAA berths. So please, stop with the freaking comparison's against our little brother. No one but you gives a sh!t what your boy Hoiberg is bringing in. We beat them pretty handily last year in Iowa City, they lost more talent than we did coming into this year, so I expect to win again in Ames.

Maybe that will shut you up about ISU.....we can only hope!
 
How is Iowa at #4?? I just don't see it YET. They have proven nothing to me other than feasting on cupcakes. They struggled with one at that too. Iowa still lacks a dynamic player that can be the difference maker in clutch time. Iowa lost a bunch of close games because of a lack of one last year and that wasn't addressed this year or 2014 either. Iowa does have depth but doesn't mean they have talent though. I'm still in "prove it to me" mode with Iowa basketball. Right now this team still feels and looks like last year's bubble team.

Iowa could beat Tarkanian's best UNLV team and you would still fine something to whine about. Give it a rest already
 
Fran has missed on recruiting. If there is a flaw in Fran it's his recruiting so far. If he lands a difference maker this Iowa team is scary good. I look at ISU and the transfer thing and it's worked big time for them. I wish Fran would land a transfer like White or Kane or Clyburn. It could really make the difference for Iowa.

Iowa has played the 5th EASIEST in the COUNTRY! When they start upping the competition and beating them, then they are legit.

Look, Iowa is going to be good but I don't know that they'll be much better than they were last year. Iowa's a tourney team though.

Yeah landing top 50 players is terrible recruiting. Iowa will have one of the toughest schedules in the nation after the big ten season. You must not realize how tough the big ten will be this year. Anything else you want to complain about that isn't even a problem?
 
ISU has a nice ball club; but, no depth. As the year wears on, the lack of depth will take its toll, maybe through an injury, but certainly through physical and mental fatigue. If they do beat Iowa in Ames, I will not go into panic mode. Hilton is a great venue for the home team. If you want to find a coach who recruits better than Fran, don't put your $ on FH. Again, take a look at his team's depth...transfers and juco's often create disadvantages in this area. As to the cry for a difference maker: Aaron White, Marble, and Uthoff will alternately fill that role just fine. And, guys like McCabe, Gesell, and Basabe will step up and win some big games for Iowa as the season rolls along. Book it.
 

Latest posts

Top