Search results

"Move on"

Old joke. Tired joke.

Now do our defense.

Tough call. Lutmer and Graves standout but a lot of guys are playing better than last year. The DBs have all progressed.

If one game tilted the scales, he wasn't really a serious candidate to begin with. A lot of "experts" connected the dots because he went to Penn St and knew the AD but that was all speculation. Talked to a number of PSU folks in Iowa City a couple weeks ago and none of them named Rhule as their...

I think Iowa gets in if they sweep to 10-2 and Oregon falls to either USC or Washington. Then we'd be the clear #3 with quality wins against Oregon and USC. I don't see Michigan beating tOSU.

Yes. That said, you run the offense very differently with a guy who can RPO like MG than you would a Stanley or Petras. Maybe that's why Hecklinski jumped Brown on the depth chart. He fits what Lester is trying to do.

This kid sounds talented but doesn't seem to fit the mold that Lester is moving toward. If Brown transfers that leaves us with 3 QBs 5'11" 188 6'1" 197 6'1" 218 Not the big pocket passer types. @Zstatman at 6'5" he'd be much taller than Gronowski. He's 6'2"

Some are placing way too much emphasis on how the good team you lost to is. BEAT THEM and it's a non-issue. The ISU game has very little bearing on Iowa's playoff chances. We have to win out which would give us wins against Oregon and USC. That'll get the Hawks in

Michigan has the inside track on the 4th slot

10-2 will get us in. Nothing less.

You are wrong.

Agree for the most part, but Mark has been slow on his reads. A number of those incompletions could have been good had he thrown the ball earlier

SI.com is one of the worst sports sites out there

The difference in speed isn't that great. He played on two Championship teams in FCS so he's faced a lot of good competition and athletes

Where did you source this stat? Link?

Yes and No, especially on the "doesn't need to". There's a reason we haven't been able to beat any really good teams for years. A great D and special teams can only take you so far. 8 wins/yr, Yes. Big wins, you need a little more. We did it with Stanley, Beathard and others before. Why not now?

TD/INT is a key stat. MG is 3/4. Not good. He throws some nice balls but is often late with his decisions.

Yes they do. But that doesn't prove that receiving the ball is the reason for it.

Just for yucks I looked it up. 134 teams in FBS. #67 is Stanford with an average of 229 yards/game. (Yes, I know that's the "median" not the "mean" but it's what was available). Close enough So "average" would be 229 yard/game