Search results

What are some examples of the Hawkeye back up looking terrible? I thought Stanley filled in nicely last year on the few plays CJ was out. I thought CJ looked pretty good subbing in for Rudock when Rudock was hurt. I thought Vandy played pretty well when Stanzi was injured. Stanzi coming in...

We did even better than a transfer. We got Easley.

Maybe if we ran a 3-4.

Barta: Kirk, we need to talk about Brian. Kirk: oh yeah? Barta: We are getting a lot of pressure from fans. I have to ask you to let him go. Kirk: *snort* Or else what? Barta: .... Kirk: That's what I thought. *Proceeds to compare the situation to the 1978 Pitt Panthers* ...

He won't fire Brian no matter what. Brian either decides to move on, or he takes over the program. Worst case is Brian sucks, so neither of those occur and he just hangs on with Dad and Uncle Phil until sometime next decade.

He's 3rd string wlb, which probably means he's behind not only Bower and Amani Jones, but also Hockaday, and perhaps even Garbutt.

It's not. 2017 will be just about the least critical year he's had at Iowa. 100% job security. The shield of a tougher schedule, a new QB, and a new offense getting broken in. It's a lot like 2011 and *shutters* 2012. Doesn't really matter in his long term plans because he can just hold out...

Nice to see that Easley must be impressing. Also it's kind of interesting that we've gotten rid of the 3 WR depth charts.

Kirk said Slater left the program back around the bowl game. I hadn't heard that before. Was this new info that he's no longer on the team? Or did I just miss an earlier announcement?

I think Williams stays. He was in the doghouse for a while, but by the end of the year, he was consistently getting quality minutes, and seeing the court during crunch time more than Moss. He has a role on this team. So does Wags. If you mixed him and Kreiner up, you'd have a good player...

RPI isn't determinative. Omaha gets in, and NCAA could look long and hard at putting Iowa against Omaha in the first 4. That's a story they can sell. Iowa has to prove they are better than that, Omaha has to prove it wasn't a fluke.

Is that like a nose job? Or more like a blow job?

What an embarrassing thread for TS.

"...more than good at RB." We had Coker and DeAndre Johnson. With Waegher and Robinson coming off impressive frosh seasons. In retrospect, reaching for David Johnson might have been useful.

I expect we will see a rotation. Hesse was starter this year, but he wasn't on the field much more than the Nelsons. Add in Happy Epenesa, and I bet we rotate at least those 4, with at least three of them in on passing downs.

By "Barta paradox," I assume you mean the paradox of whether an AD who has no real power over the football program is really an AD, correct?

I like Mitchell, but most of the snaps he takes are going to take away snaps from Daniels and Wadley. As long as both of those guys are healthy, they should be getting most of the snaps.

More likely, it is for a possible fake on the field goal or extra point. Coluzzi is the holder, but we may be able to sneak CJB in there on a fake because they have the same number.

Every time you start an article title with you last name, I read it as a question.

Came into thread ready to vote for long hair. Then I read the OP and realized if iowalaw felt this way, it must be wrong. That there reverse advocacy is impressive, man. You'd be a really good lawyer to have on the other side.