Search results

agree

I've seen "could" but not "would". I would have rather lost with Georges than to wonder what might have been. Could have still lost to UCONN.

Lol at OP

What is Iowa's strategy? I'm pretty old by the way.

ISU would have begged to be compared to Kentucky before Fred was hired. Thank you for that reminder. ISU has won more NCAA tournament games in the last 3 years than Iowa has played in. If people are still bringing up the Lick comparisons next year then that illustrates a failure for Fran. Lick...

How did you bring up posts from last year? Impressive. rooting

Yes, ISU looks bad at basketball.

The team has met your expectations which, of course, weren't out of whack lofty?

It's not a criteria but more of a function of how quality wins/losses transpire over the course of a season. The committee has actually said that conference placement is not a criteria. It just so happens that doing good in your conference usually leads to a good tournament resume'. Be careful...

I'll bet you $500 or any amount you are comfortable losing.

No, they don't.

yep

eatingpopcorn.gif

Maybe Iowa fans should have appreciated Davis more? I wont apologize for having reverence for Orr. How Hawk fans feel about Davis is out of my control and certainly not a concern.

You have to look at what was going on before they were hired. Besides, why would you care how ISU fans feel about Orr? Especially now, decades later.

I didn't hear Dakich say this but that was the story back in the Davis days. I guess I don't see a problem with it if it was true.

Yet are 0-1 and in last. ;)

It's more like comparing riding a bike up a hill or riding it on flat pavement. It's different.

I'll care about polls only if ISU is left out of the top 25 and I perceive it as a slight. Other than that I don't care since they all get you highlights. The committee doesn't care so I won't.

He was the only kid I feared in the ISU game. And I feared him plenty.