Search results

That is called a "home field" advantage. Proud to be loud and as long as it doesn't mess up the hawkeye players it is a good thing.

Kicking did not look any better to me than last year and I thought last year was weak. Therefore when you don't get better at it when it should have been a concern I point it out more.

I agree but hillier may lose out to someone else with that fumble. I think 6 main guys with others getting snaps. Last yr we really had 2 main guys all yr and the others were very green this is a deep group and then factor in the tight ends and you have one good receiving corp.

Kick offs were ok at best...coverage was solid but I was talking about the actual kicker. The missed fg was big and could have been haunting. Plus the fact that there has been talk out of camp that the kicking game is weak followed up by a missed fg.

Early in the game it looked very much by design. As the game went on he went through his progression more and they started hitting more deep. I think it was a specific gameplan for the first game of the yr and we will see how it evolves.

Completely agree that is why I think the biggest positive is video to show the players how they messed up and coach them up for the next one. reminds of good KF teams...start slow and finish strong. In games and seasons.

Experience at many positions. Lomax and Mabin are inexperienced at DB. All three linebackers are inexperienced...even Alston being a senior hasn't played a lot of quality snaps. That is 5 of 11 defenders. Then on offense outside of smith and kmm I would say the receivers are still green as none...

I feel that overall there are a lot of good things that came from the game. The biggest is game experience and the coaches really seeing the deficiencies in game situation so they can scheme better for better opponents. Defense: DE - ott was very good. The other side is limited as hardy has...

Probably just more muscular...I think he was listed at 205 last yr and I saw he was listed at 208 this yr.