Search results

Can you find a link or specific reference point? Because this topic has irritated me for years, and I finally got around to podding about it.

Because people want to say Iowa doesn't coach up QB's as they get older...so yeah, if an injury is responsible for regression, it doesn't count, to me, as evidence that Iowa's coaches can't develop quarterbacks as they age

Tate had an oblique issue. Those take a long time to heal, with complete rest. Tate didn't have that. He missed one game. So yeah, it impacts it. Jake was not a multi-year starter. He started the opener in 2008, then Stanzi started, then Jake, then Stanzi the rest of the way. Seems silly...

This is true but there are other macro factors...such as TATE: He suffered an oblique injury in training camp going into his senior year. In baseball, that takes 6 to 8 weeks of NOTHING to heal from. Tate never had 'nothing' time to heal. Also as a soph, his stats were better...but his...

All of these numbers are included in the podcast article

Nope. It wasn't. Deace brings this up often, over the years...and I tell him I do not agree.

Can you expand on the development aspects??

It's a good thing you didn't bail after that game. You would have missed what was, IMO, the most remarkable Iowa football season of my lifetime

I chose Tate because both he and Stanley are true sophs, in their first year of starting.

Ppl are far more inclined to take the time to express a negative opinion than a positive opinion. Just human nature

This is all apropos of nothing...but I had no idea what I would find when I began this. Nearly identical attempts, completions and yards... Both were first year starters in their true soph seasons. Stanley with a much better TD/INT ratio...and rating. Similar YPA. Stanley with more bigger...

I don't have the time to look this up, but I am guessing it's not rare I don't care who you think I sound like. I'll call things as I see them. If you agree, great. If you disagree, that's great, too. It's when you disagree, and then roll out crazy rationale projections on me for the basis...

Well, that is good...you are doing the things you have in your control to try to have a say...even if it doesn't get a response.

Greg Davis was all about sight reads...and receivers running routes based on what they were seeing, and hoping the QB saw the same things, or vice versa...I remember KMM explaining this to me in 2012 media day, and I was very dubious. different route trees...different terminology. That was...

What are some ways you can make an impact with your displeasure? I dont know the answers, but I can definitely tell you that posting like a third grader on a message board the coaches or AD's you are so incensed with will have zero impact. Write Gary a letter, don't buy tickets, etc.

which is pretty smart, given how everyone says they know where Iowa is going to go on an audible, right?

Let's be frank...save some time for both of us. I think you're a delta bravo, and you just wait for the negative things to happen. I've got no time to waste on users like this. So as far as I am concerned, we're done here.

They just lost two games by one possession, one to the #4 ranked team in the nation on the last second of the game. Sometimes, the other team is better, or plays better.

Yup. Kirk, From March (OkstHawk is gonna be so disappointed): Q. Are you pleased with where you are at? KIRK FERENTZ: No, we’ve never looked real pretty in the spring; at least I can’t remember a year where that’s the case. That’s just part of spring practice, and if we’re there on August...

You're right, we don't agree...and it has nothing to do with anyone being a 'company man', so GTFO of here with that weak sauce. I'm the only 'media member' I know of to get their creds revoked for a line of criticism and we wouldn't have gotten them back were it not for Rob and Pat then at...