Search results

Tolzien just had a case of the Stanzi's.

Minnesota beat a good Middle Tennessee State team, NW beat a SEC team.

Denard looked really good today.

I think Sandeman had a fine game, but it still frustrates me that DJK and McNutt are not on the field all of the time. Last year, DJK and McNutt could have had better seasons had they been on the field more. McNutt didn't even play most of the Michigan St. game and only was on the field on the...

Basically only the 2 teams that we don't play didn't look good. Add ISU and Arizona who both looked good and it appears we have one heck of a schedule.

Also if my aunt had nuts, she'd be my uncle.

The score was 3-0 when Clay got hurt. I wouldn't consider that "ran all over". Also Clay came back in but was ineffective, because Iowa made adjustments. Iowa also had a lot of people battling the flu that game. They came out flat, but after about a quarter and a half, they controlled the game.

If you watch the 2nd video (after Ferentz) they show the 3 easiest schedules. Brad Edwards who has always been a terrible analyst is giving his thoughts. This is the guy that is supposed to be their BCS expert and he's always way off. Big Ten Blog - ESPN

Have you seen Nebraska's schedule?

This thread sounds like this skit with the Super Fans. Hulu - Saturday Night Live: Bill Swerkski's Super Fans

I am not trying to start a fight, I am just pointing out that Nebraska hasn't done anything for a long long time. I am sure Iowa and Nebraska have played a similar amount of ranked teams in the last 8 years. The point is Iowa won 13 of them, Nebraska has won 0.

Good point. I hope that's the case.

It doesn't matter to me who starts either. It matters how much they play. McNutt and DJK alternated plays for much of the year last year. It's my opinion that we are better when they are both on the field. The fact that the 2 deeps still include DJK as a platoon player (like last year) is...

So if he played more snaps...don't you think he would have even better numbers?

Well this isn't actually true. Considering that DJK and McNutt basically split time last year and were not on the field at the same time that often. At least not as much as Stross was on the field with them. To me, it is rather significant that it says DJK or Sandeman. I was of the opinion...

I hope so. But I get the feeling that Sandeman and others are going to get a lot of playing time. I would prefer to have Davis out there, but after re-watching the Orange Bowl last night, Sandeman was their guy.

Exactly. Which again points to the fact, that this dominant Nebraska program that is going to dominate that Big 10, hasn't beat a team that finished the season ranked since 2001. 8 years! Soon to be 9 years!

This would be a great lineup for Iowa. Michigan is going to fire RichRod this year and is going to need several years to get back on track. Nebraska, contrary to popular belief is not and has not been the powerhouse they once were. They still haven't beat a team that finished the season...

Minnesota has won more National Championships than Nebraska...but that past doesn't mean much for them right now. The OP is correct. Iowa is a better program right now and has been for 8 years, which is a pretty long time. Nebraska does have it's hype machine working which is big in college...

How did you get these tickets? Any on stubhub or ebay?