Back to Basics: Iowa Dominates

JonDMiller

Publisher/Founder
Back to Basics, Iowa Dominates

If feeding the post and asserting their dominance in the paint wasn't a point of emphasis for Iowa prior to its game against Texas A&M Corpus Christi, it looked like it on Saturday.

The Hawkeyes went to the paint early and often, building a 44-23 lead at the half before winning 88-59. The Hawks were 13-24 from floor in the first half and 22-7 on glass plus a robust 16-22 at line. Iowa scored 20 points in paint led by a stellar half from Melsahn Basabe and Adam Woodbury.

Woodbury hit half hooks with both hands in the early going as well as nailing an elbow 15 footer. Basabe was all over the floor during his first 'shift', a five minute stretch where he scored 13 straight points on a mix of low block moves, running layups and making free throws. He had 15 points at the break which included seven of eight from the free throw line. Woodbury scored 11 in the first half on four of four shooting and three of four from the line.

Iowa hit 55 percent of their shots on the day (29 of 52) and had 22 assists on those 29 field goals, an exceptional number. Iowa was 8 of 19 on three-pointers, with Devyn Marble going 3 of 3 and Mike Gesell 2 of 2. Marble hit all of his trey's in the second half en route to a 15 point, five rebound and three assist afternoon.

Basabe led all Hawkeyes with 17 points, those coming in just 13 minutes of action. He had five rebonds as well as he was pure energy on the floor and proved to be an early catalyst for the team. Woodbury had 13 points and five rebounds in 20 minutes as he did not get in early foul trouble in this game. Josh Oglesby added 12 points and Mike Gesell scored nine in addition to four assists.

Anthony Clemmons led Iowa with five assists in his first career start; he replaced Zach McCabe in the starting lineup and it was the first time since 2008 where Iowa had started three freshmen in the same game.

Aaron White scored six points and had three rebounds in just 11 minutes; he received a technical foul in the first half and Basabe started in his place in the second half.

Iowa dismantled a weak opponent and played their best game in weeks. The Hawkeyes are now 6-2, their two losses coming against the only two teams inside Ken Pomeroy's Top 80. Iowa has another tune up on Tuesday night against South Dakota before back to back games against Iowa State (in Iowa City) and Northern Iowa (in Des Moines). The South Dakota game will the Iowa's last game not available on widely distributed television

Picture-11.jpg
 








It probably doesn't "prove" anything; however, confidence-wise, this was a nice game.

If you watched us play Princeton or Campbell last year, you know they don't always go the way today's game went.

We started 3 Fr, 1 so, and a jr. Keep that in mind.
 






My point is we're playing teams like Corpus Christi when at the same time, Purdue is playing Xavier. Quite a big difference in competition. Then again, I see the OSU Puke-eyes are playing some pansies of the poor from Kentucky today. It's just comical at times.
 


My point is we're playing teams like Corpus Christi when at the same time, Purdue is playing Xavier. Quite a big difference in competition. Then again, I see the OSU Puke-eyes are playing some pansies of the poor from Kentucky today. It's just comical at times.

The majority of teams play weak teams in the non-conference. There aren't all that many Michigan States out there that go after other top teams in the preseason. This team isn't really built for that kind of a schedule yet. The schedule will start getting tougher after this season, IMO.
 


This is the lineup I feel gives us our best chances. It makes us thin in the 1-3 spots if we play white at the 4 (his natural position). But it gives us better lateral quickness for defense and gives us 5 post players to soften the foul problems that we will encounter in the b1g because they will attack woodbury. Hopefully this will allow us to see how good ingram is and could potentially set up a better situation next year as with jok and uthoff coming in would have forced white back to the 4 spot anyway.

No beating up on a team like this didn't help much but it does allow fran to do some tweaking to his rotation. Which I see more like this:

1) clemmons/gesell/marble
2) gesell/ogelsby/ingram
3) marble/ogelsby/white
4) white/basabe/mccabe
5) woodbury/mccabe/basabe

With may and olaseni helping out to spare people some minutes. Legit 9 man rotation.
 


This is the lineup I feel gives us our best chances. It makes us thin in the 1-3 spots if we play white at the 4 (his natural position). But it gives us better lateral quickness for defense and gives us 5 post players to soften the foul problems that we will encounter in the b1g because they will attack woodbury. Hopefully this will allow us to see how good ingram is and could potentially set up a better situation next year as with jok and uthoff coming in would have forced white back to the 4 spot anyway.

No beating up on a team like this didn't help much but it does allow fran to do some tweaking to his rotation. Which I see more like this:

1) clemmons/gesell/marble
2) gesell/ogelsby/ingram
3) marble/ogelsby/white
4) white/basabe/mccabe
5) woodbury/mccabe/basabe

With may and olaseni helping out to spare people some minutes. Legit 9 man rotation.

Scratching my head??? Are you suggesting that if first name is the one that is in the game and if taken out then the second name would replace them and the third name would replace the second name as an preferred order?
 


if we had scheduled top 25 teams, we'd be getting slaughtered. not there yet. and would be dumb.
 


No clue why we play teams like this as it proves absolutely nothing 7 games into the season.

you must be new to college basketball, basketballman.

No kidding.

For a young team especially, games like this are great confidence-builders and give the players a chance to work on things, build on-court chemistry etc. You wouldn't want all your pre-season competition to be this weak, and it's not.
 




No clue why we play teams like this as it proves absolutely nothing 7 games into the season.
It's an opportunity for the team to improve. I'd like to play tougher competition as well but these games are very meaningful to improvement and experience. Especially for the freshman.
 


Scratching my head??? Are you suggesting that if first name is the one that is in the game and if taken out then the second name would replace them and the third name would replace the second name as an preferred order?

Just saying that we can go three deep at each spot with those 9 guys. Obviously some weak points to work on in the next years (like getting real depth at the 5 instead of using 4s there) but it would be formidable. The 2 & 3 spots will get more depth next year with jok and uthoff. Along with adding meyer who hopefully can give some better depth at the 5.
 


Just saying that we can go three deep at each spot with those 9 guys. Obviously some weak points to work on in the next years (like getting real depth at the 5 instead of using 4s there) but it would be formidable. The 2 & 3 spots will get more depth next year with jok and uthoff. Along with adding meyer who hopefully can give some better depth at the 5.

I don't see Meyer giving depth at the 5, unless you mean that allows other players to spend more time at the 5. I was under the impression that Meyer was more like White, a big who can play away from the basket. I can see him helping the team a lot at the 4.
 


I don't see Meyer giving depth at the 5, unless you mean that allows other players to spend more time at the 5. I was under the impression that Meyer was more like White, a big who can play away from the basket. I can see him helping the team a lot at the 4.

I look at meyer and the only way I see him playing next year is if he plays the 5. We will have 3 guys at the 4 (white, basabe, and mccabe). I don't see our 2nd best player and 2 seniors losing time to him. And the 5 spot has no depth. With meyer being 6'10 I think he will be best at the 5 and I don't really see olaseni playing more than him at the 5. Next year there will be a lot of players to fill things out.

1) gesell & clemmons (marble if necessary)
2) ingram & ogelsby & jok (marble & gesell can play here too)
3) marble & uthoff (white if necessary)
4) white & basabe & mccabe (uthoff & meyer depending on match ups)
5) woodbury & meyer & olaseni (basabe & white & mccabe depending on match ups)
 




Latest posts






Top