Husker Writer: Delany uses Rose Bowl as crutch

GhostofBTT said:
I gotta be honest brah...I have no idea what any of this means.
Click to expand...

I know you don't. Why? Well, le Ghost, typical of many posters on this board, you write in threads where you have no actual knowledge. Some do it on occasion. Some do it often. You do it as a career.

I speak teh truth. Kurt would agree.
 


hawkeyebob62 said:
I know you don't. Why? Well, le Ghost, typical of many posters on this board, you write in threads where you have no actual knowledge. Some do it on occasion. Some do it often. You do it as a career.

I speak teh truth. Kurt would agree.
Click to expand...

No, I started this thread, and have plenty of knowledge. Your thought was incomprehensible. I don't care how many commas you use, run on sentences are run on sentences.
 


hawkeyebob62 said:
Do you know ANYthing about "the old system"? Do you even understand that writers used to pick a national champion BEFORE the bowls were played? Do you further understand that "voters" and "pundits" will be responsible for selecting "playoff" teams, just as before?

You can "le" and "teh" this forum to death. It doesn't mask the fact you don't have a clue.
Click to expand...

That's "don't have teh clue". Le fail.
 


hawkeyebob62 said:
Do you know ANYthing about "the old system"? Do you even understand that writers used to pick a national champion BEFORE the bowls were played? Do you further understand that "voters" and "pundits" will be responsible for selecting "playoff" teams, just as before?

You can "le" and "teh" this forum to death. It doesn't mask the fact you don't have a clue.
Click to expand...

In the interim voters will select them but eventually every power conference will have a championship game and that will decide who advances to a playoff.

The sooner voting and computers are taken out the equation the better.
 












GhostofBTT said:
No, I started this thread, and have plenty of knowledge. Your thought was incomprehensible. I don't care how many commas you use, run on sentences are run on sentences.
Click to expand...

Nice dodge. Seriously? Punctuation? An attempt (meager, I might add) at calling out "run on sentences"?
 


hawkeyebob62 said:
Nice dodge. Seriously? Punctuation? An attempt (meager, I might add) at calling out "run on sentences"?
Click to expand...

It's not a dodge when he was pointing out your punctuation mishaps in the first place (that's why he said he had no idea what anything you said meant).
 


hawkeyebob62 said:
Nice dodge. Seriously? Punctuation? An attempt (meager, I might add) at calling out "run on sentences"?
Click to expand...

What happened, no foolin', is that I tried to find any logical consistency in your post, got distracted by its presentation, and was unable, and unwilling, to try and crack it.

Also, I am too lazy to go back and remember what we were arguing about in le first place, so I really don't care anymore. All I remember is that you were wrong, and I was handsome and charming.
 




GhostofBTT said:
What happened, no foolin', is that I tried to find any logical consistency in your post, got distracted by its presentation, and was unable, and unwilling, to try and crack it.

Also, I am too lazy to go back and remember what we were arguing about in le first place, so I really don't care anymore. All I remember is that you were wrong, and I was handsome and charming.
Click to expand...

Le fin.
 




You must log in or register to reply here.


Latest posts

Share this page






Top