NikeHawk21
Well-Known Member
I heard Weiskamp and Pat were going head to head. Anyone have updates?
Weiskamp had close to 30. Patrick was at 19 when I stopped watching it. I'm 47 and I think I'd start for Muscatine. Joe had no help.I heard Weiskamp and Pat were going head to head. Anyone have updates?
watched on-line. Weiskamp looks like and plays like a college-ready player. Was double & triple teamed by IC West all game - still had 29 and dunked at least twice easily thru traffic.
He'll start day 1 as a 2guard.
P McCaffery is still growing. Looks like most 6'8 Jr's do physically. Needs work w/ left around rim. Like a young Nunge - still 20 months from 1st day of college practice
Not strong enough to play inside. Not good enough outside shot to play on the wing. He needs to hit the buffet and the weight room his SR season.McCaffery kinda blended in with everyone else. He looked good, but not great. Weiskamp was night and day better.
Not strong enough to play inside. Not good enough outside shot to play on the wing. He needs to hit the buffet and the weight room his SR season.
True. Why not join the Hawks weight regimen.Not strong enough to play inside. Not good enough outside shot to play on the wing. He needs to hit the buffet and the weight room his SR season.
The rankings come from summer camps and AAU circuit (of course) and those people know their stuff.As of now I agree. After watching Weiskamp be head and shoulders against everyone on the floor, he either deserves a better ranking, or McCaffery deserves a worse one. I get that he is a year younger, but I'm not sure Pat's ceiling is as high as Joe is now.
My brother kind of gave same report. Off night hopefully.McCaffery kinda blended in with everyone else. He looked good, but not great. Weiskamp was night and day better.
The rankings come from summer camps and AAU circuit (of course) and those people know their stuff.
Maybe Pat doesn’t stand out on the floor because he doesn’t need to on his team?
I didn’t watch so don’t know. Just asking.
My brother kind of gave same report. Off night hopefully.
Sure hope Weiskamp can provide Jokish play at the 2! How's his D?
Weiskamp's ranking is 100% legit. Patrick's jump shot isn't close to Joe's.As of now I agree. After watching Weiskamp be head and shoulders against everyone on the floor, he either deserves a better ranking, or McCaffery deserves a worse one. I get that he is a year younger, but I'm not sure Pat's ceiling is as high as Joe is now.
Weiskamp's ranking is 100% legit. Patrick's jump shot isn't close to Joe's.
It could be.I'm thinking Weiskamps ranking is low.
I took a little bit of heat for saying I think Pmac is overrated, but I’m not surprised by the reports above and other things I have heard.
At his size and frame it would be one thing if he was a lights out shooter, but from almost all reports that isn’t the case, and he even has work to do on his shooting form.
The positive is he’s only a junior so he has time to fill out and continue to improve his shot. I certainly think he’s worthy of a P5 scholarship but I don’t think he’s a top 50 kid, probably not even top 100 at this point. Those are the types of kids you expect to come in and make an instant impact, and even with a full year I don’t see that being the case with Pmac. The potential is certainly intriguing so I’m excited to see how he improves going forward.