IndianaHawk
Well-Known Member
Two years removed from a meaningful game, will Uthoff shake the rust quickly?
Two years removed from a meaningful game, will Uthoff shake the rust quickly?
What rust? He's never played in a college game and is better today, far better, than when he played HS ball
Is this a serious question? If you were a high school newspaper reporter, and had to take 2 years off from reporting actual events, would it be preposterous to think that you'd struggle to be Frank Deford from jump street? Also, how do you know he's far better than he was at Wash? Because he was mediocre at PTL? Because he was invisible in Estonia?
I think it's a valid question, and it has to do with his ability to establish a role on our team. As we all know, he has a bit of a clone in Aaron White, so creating a niche on floor (especially defensively) will be his challenge. Hopefully, we'll see the full arsenal by the middle of the Big Ten slate.
Now you're just making things up. No one said that Uthoff was going to set the world on fire (at least in this thread). You, on the other hand, quantified his improvement by saying he is far better than he was in high school. How do you know that? Is Josh Oglesby far better than he was in high school?
You scoff at IndianaHawk for engaging reasonable speculation - the atrophy of skill after time away from activity - and then engage in speculation yourself. I'm not saying either of you are wrong, I just don't get the righteous indignation.
I understand your point, but you have to admit that he probably does do this, right?Do people think he has been playing video games and eating chips for two years?
Do people think he has been playing video games and eating chips for two years?
Is this a serious question? If you were a high school newspaper reporter, and had to take 2 years off from reporting actual events, would it be preposterous to think that you'd struggle to be Frank Deford from jump street? Also, how do you know he's far better than he was at Wash? Because he was mediocre at PTL? Because he was invisible in Estonia?
I think it's a valid question, and it has to do with his ability to establish a role on our team. As we all know, he has a bit of a clone in Aaron White, so creating a niche on floor (especially defensively) will be his challenge. Hopefully, we'll see the full arsenal by the middle of the Big Ten slate.
Now you're just making things up. No one said that Uthoff was going to set the world on fire (at least in this thread). You, on the other hand, quantified his improvement by saying he is far better than he was in high school. How do you know that? Is Josh Oglesby far better than he was in high school?
You scoff at IndianaHawk for engaging reasonable speculation - the atrophy of skill after time away from activity - and then engage in speculation yourself. I'm not saying either of you are wrong, I just don't get the righteous indignation.
Do I think he's far better than what he was as a skinny senior in high school after being taught by Bo Ryan and Fran McCaffery for two years?
Is this is a trick question?
And who is saying this guy is gonna be all that? HE"S NEVER BEEN ANYTHING AT THE COLLEGE LEVEL
I was just on the radio this week saying people need to tap the breaks on their expectations for him. If he can average 7 or 8 and 4 that would be a great first year on a team that can go 11 deep.
What rust? He's never played in a college game and is better today, far better, than when he played HS ball