Rewatched the ISU Game

deanvogs said:
No way you watched that game once, let alone re watched it. Only a complete and total fing imbecile could say that Iowa didn't assert it's will until the 15 play drive. On the first 3 possessions (first 17 min of the game), Iowa had 133 total yards and a TD. If they would have moved the ball that effectively the whole game that is 466 yds of total offense, instead of the 368 they ended up with. In that same time period ISU had managed 29 yards on 3 possessions. My God you are dumb, and don't know sh!t about the game of football.
Click to expand...

Dean stop breaking the rules that are not enforced. You are poking at a bear that wants to be poked.
 


OUTofTOWNHAWK said:
Dean stop breaking the rules that are not enforced. You are poking at a bear that wants to be poked.
Click to expand...

Sash and I have a history, in that he has always been a d0uche and I have always trolled him. I like trolling the trolls....don't think for a second a troll like him actually gets to me.
 


Sheldor said:
You are not worthy to enter into that kind of agreement with me. That's like exchanging a pawn for a queen in a game of chess. Edit: I see that you have set the line at 31 points, so I will accept your wager. Have fun never posting here again, fool.
Click to expand...

The line is actually -17 I believe. I would be happy to bet you using that number. You claimed it would be a battle for 4 quarters, 48-17 was merely my prediction.
 


Sheldor said:
You're right. ISU never shot themselves in the foot, dropped passes, or turned the ball over. Idiot.
Click to expand...


You know that point in a fight when the guy in trouble just starts punching wildly to get a shot in before either 1) he's knocked out(banned) or 2) the fight is called (again, banned)......Yeah.....That's you.

buh bye now...or later...but eventually....you gone.
 




deanvogs said:
Sash and I have a history, in that he has always been a d0uche and I have always trolled him. I like trolling the trolls....don't think for a second a troll like him actually gets to me.
Click to expand...

Ahhhh, I remember him now. It's always fun to know the new alt Trolls that get banned and come back...gives ya a sense of nostolgia.
 


CJ was a favorite topic until we all found out he can't catch. He gets hyped by the media because of his size but he hasn't done anything to warrant any further hype from those of us who watch every game.

"There are too many drops". It's marginally better than last year, but the fact is that Iowa doesn't have any receivers that can catch the ball. The best reception we have seen in two years is BJ Lowey's INT. Any team out there that watches film on Iowa is going to load up the box three out of four downs. Until Iowa makes them respect the pass.
 




Sheldor said:
You're right. ISU never shot themselves in the foot, dropped passes, or turned the ball over. Idiot.
Click to expand...

Lemme get this straight... You are sticking with your assertion that Iowa's performance early on wasn't dominant.
I think they were (and missed on a couple opportunities to be even more dominant).
And since you are dumdum, I think I'll stick with my assessment on how it went. Kthxbuhbye.
 


I'm re watching it right now and I love the fact that they're getting four or 5 yards every time. Just keep moving the chains moving the chains. Be able to play up tempo so they can't sub on their d. It may not be exciting but it sure is a good way to win games.
 


I don't know much about this "trolling", as you call it, but it would appear, in my uneducated opinion, that Sheldor is winning.
 


olddude said:
I'm re watching it right now and I love the fact that they're getting four or 5 yards every time. Just keep moving the chains moving the chains. Be able to play up tempo so they can't sub on their d. It may not be exciting but it sure is a good way to win games.
Click to expand...

I liked watching it. I like that brand of football with the nice pass plays thrown in and great defense. go hawks
 


OLWPAORWWM said:
I don't know much about this "trolling", as you call it, but it would appear, in my uneducated opinion, that Sheldor is winning.
Click to expand...

He isn't trolling, he is starting an intrawebz t-u-f-f guy fight.

By the flag pole after school, I got $20 on Section136.
 


Sheldor said:
Actually, you suggested a fairly significant wager on the outcome of the game, and then offered a proposed final score of said game, with Iowa putting up one of the 10 highest point totals of the Ferentz era and winning by a margin that they have not achieved in over 3 years. When called upon to back up this outlandish claim, you began to backtrack like the little bitc* that you are. I will gladly take your 31 points, with the loser never posting here again. If you back out of the wager now, the entire board will see you for the gutless pu$$y that I already know you to be. Derp, indeed.
Click to expand...


Your mom must hate having such a failure for a son.
 


Eda said:
Correct me I am wrong...
Didn't Iowa have a couple drops on a 2 different drives in the 1st quarter that would've moved the chains?

We make those catches, the offense beats up the ISU D some more early.
Click to expand...

The probelm is that the players didn't make those catches that they should.. I wish we had WRs with Hinkles hands. All that guy ever did was catch the darn ball. Not catching the ball is something I doubt just goes away. We don't have many good recievers. I wish we knew what is going on with Powell.. The leading receiver out of JC and he can't beat out Shumpert.
 






Sheldor is taking the slash and burn approach to his very short stay with us on HN. Those are typically fairly amusing, but in this case, it's actually rather pathetic because he's just not smart at all. If he was even halfway intelligent and at least ACTED like he knew something about football, then it might have made for an amusing, albeit, short stay. As such, it's just sadly pathetic.
 


Sheldor said:
Re-watched it as well and it wasn't nearly the domination that people have made it out to be. Iowa really struggled through the first quarter and a half and it wasn't until the long drive with 13 running plays towards the end of the 2nd quarter that Iowa really started to assert their will on the game. It's also disconcerting that in the two biggest drives of the half (the long rushing drive and the drive following the Morris pick) Iowa could not punch it into the endzone and had to settle for field goals. A good football team would have had a much bigger halftime lead than 13-0 for as bad as ISU looked in the first half. Their QB was also very clearly affected by the ankle injury suffered against UNI and was a shell of his usual self. They looked pretty bad against one of the worst teams in the country for the first 23 or so minutes and the last 7 minutes of the game. So that's about 30 good minutes of football and 30 bad minutes. The running game is not flashy but efficient. We have no gamebreakers or explosive players to speak of anywhere on the team, on either side of the ball. This team is going to struggle when it sees actual, real football teams in the Big Ten, and I expect a 4 quarter battle on Saturday against WMU.
Click to expand...

For 3.5 quarters it was physical domination, just less so on the scoreboard. First 2 Iowa drives ended with a drop by Hilyer on 3rd and 8 (would have been a first down). Second drive ended at the ISU 20-yard line on a fumble by Rudock. Two plays prior to that Smith dropped a pass that would have given Iowa first down at the 10-yard line.

You may be right that a good football team would have been much farther ahead at halftime. In the entire first half, Iowa State's LONGEST drive consisted to 17 yards, with 52 total yards in the first half compared to 196 yards for Iowa.

Of course it's disappointing to kick FG's instead of getting touchdowns. Us being upset about it doesn't make it any different. On the drive after the Morris pick, Rudock threw to KMM for 5. Then on second down he had Hilyer all alone by the first down marker with no one within 10 yards but Rudock opted to go for KMM in the corner of the end zone (caught out of bounds). Then on third down CJF drops the pass and you have no choice at that time but to take the points.

I would agree Iowa is in need of gamebreakers. That is readily evident. What they do appear to have is a stout front 7 on defense (even if not great at rushing the passer) and a good offensive line, a trio of backs who run hard and smart QB on offense.

But up to the 7-minute mark of the fourth quarter it was domination. 375-176 in total yards, 36 to 17 minutes in time of possession, 21-7 advantage in first downs. A game is 60 minutes long, however, and you can't just erase what happened in the last 7 minutes of the game.

The team may very well struggle against the better B1G teams. That's what I'm interested in finding out.
 


Sheldor said:
LOL, I don't even know who you are you dooshnozzle. You claim to have stalked me over multiple boards but until about a week ago I can't ever recall reading one of your posts. I know that I mean a lot to you and you value my opinion, but I can honestly say that you mean nothing to me. Sorry to hurt your feelings, brah.
Click to expand...

Where did I claim anything about other boards? I don't post on other boards. I said TylerSash and I have a history, and you post exactly like him. Are you admitting to being him, or are you some other POS that gets banned on all boards he posts on?
 


You must log in or register to reply here.


Latest posts

Share this page






Top