hawktransplant
Well-Known Member
I learned that a long time ago.
The game was there for the taking
- Thread starter HawkeyeNTexas
- Start date
I learned that a long time ago.
AdamHawk
Well-Known Member
I don't know what you're talking about. I guess it depends on what your definition of 'scrum' is. If you're saying Iowa dictated the pace of the game then I would disagree.
I'm sure a sharp analytical mind like yourself realizes how foolish it is to use an average based on a sample size of one game.
I
ILHawk
Guest
Link?
We're actually averaging 13.8 in the first 10 games and have only had two games where we scored less than 8 in the first 10 games, but I'm sure you knew that.
Good job, good effort. Keep on trollin'
I
ILHawk
Guest
Puts us on par for 55 points a game. Who's the troll? That's scrum ball and I don't like it. We have little offensive continuity unless were playing pre b1g season. lack of continuity = scrum. If this is the future of Iowa BB i'm not interested.
The guy who claimed we're averaging 8 pts in the first ten minutes of the game, next question!
But we don't average 55 points a game, and we're in the upper third in the conference in scoring despite being the worst 3 pt shooting team and play at the second highest tempo in the conference, all would suggest our gameplan is not to "scrum it up".
Hmmm....I'm beginning to think maybe you aren't quite as analytical as you say are.
RocknRollface
Well-Known Member
I don't buy that your legit for one second.
With that being said...missing shots does not equal scrum ball. Thats just stupid.
If Iowa had decent shooters who could hit open 3s they would be averaging about 10 - 15 more points a game.
Being an obvious poser you never had any credibility but you clearly don't even have a clue what your talking about.
