1) Aikman
2) Staubach
3) Don Meridith
4) Tony Romo
5) Babe Laufenberg
1) Aikman
2) Staubach
3) Don Meridith
4) Tony Romo
5) Babe Laufenberg
Better add Danny White, Quincy Carter and Jason Garrett to that list, too.
I won't say all time, just my time. And this is if I needed one guy to win one game
1. Elway in his prime could hurt you with his legs and arm
2. Manning seems like the smartest QB I have ever seen
3. Montana; didnt like the 49ers but he won 4 Superbowls, with great talent aroujnd him
4. Brady is like a surgeon
5. Favre is a gutty game, but risky
6. Marino; huge arm, smart guy, not great talent around him
7. Staubach; just loved Roger the Dodger...my all time fav NFL player
8. Kurt Warner; takes two moribund franchises to Super Bowl
I think Bradshaw was mostly a product of one of the greatest defenses to ever play the game.
I won't say all time, just my time. And this is if I needed one guy to win one game
1. Elway in his prime could hurt you with his legs and arm
2. Manning seems like the smartest QB I have ever seen
3. Montana; didnt like the 49ers but he won 4 Superbowls, with great talent aroujnd him
4. Brady is like a surgeon
5. Favre is a gutty game, but risky
6. Marino; huge arm, smart guy, not great talent around him
7. Staubach; just loved Roger the Dodger...my all time fav NFL player
8. Kurt Warner; takes two moribund franchises to Super Bowl
I think Bradshaw was mostly a product of one of the greatest defenses to ever play the game.
I won't say all time, just my time. And this is if I needed one guy to win one game
1. Elway in his prime could hurt you with his legs and arm
2. Manning seems like the smartest QB I have ever seen
3. Montana; didnt like the 49ers but he won 4 Superbowls, with great talent aroujnd him
4. Brady is like a surgeon
5. Favre is a gutty game, but risky
6. Marino; huge arm, smart guy, not great talent around him
7. Staubach; just loved Roger the Dodger...my all time fav NFL player
8. Kurt Warner; takes two moribund franchises to Super Bowl
I think Bradshaw was mostly a product of one of the greatest defenses to ever play the game.
I agree on Montana. His first Super Bowl, he had no Rice, no Taylor, no Craig, etc. on offense. Dwight Clark and Freddie Solomon were the WRs and the RBs were non-descript. (Note - I am a Cowboys fan, so this hurts to type). I think Montana is the type of QB that made everyone around him better and didn't make mistakes. Manning has the physical tools, but not everything that makes the best QB.I dont see any way you can have Manning above Montana. Montana has 4 rings - talent around him or not, that is the trump card in my book. Other than that i agree with this list for the most part
I agree on Bradshaw as well. Sure, he had a great defense around him, but not all of the SBs were won with defense. Check the stats in SBs XIII and XIV (he was the MVP of both):Manning number 2 if you have to win one game? Based on what, the regular season?
Marino and Smart are two words I never thought would be used in the same sentence except if the word 'not' was included.
Bradshaw the 'prduct of a great defense' baffles me. I know their D was great, but if that's all it took was a 'great defense' then why didn't the Bears of the mid 80's win more than one SB or the Raven's of 00's? Why, because they didn't have great QB play. If you recall some of Bradshaw's best games came in big games.