That sucked. 18% shooting in the championship, not the way you wanna go out.
It relies ALOT on great execution.
What we saw is exactly what happened at Iowa for 3 years. You can't execute when you are physically and athletically overmatched. If Butler's guard can't beat their man and cause the bigs of the other team to help the offense stalls.
What we saw is exactly what happened at Iowa for 3 years. You can't execute when you are physically and athletically overmatched. If Butler's guard can't beat their man and cause the bigs of the other team to help the offense stalls.
You did see them beat Pitt and Florida, right?
I understand Iowa fans complaining about the system because they are still traumatized by the Lickliter era, but to me it was more a matter of historically bad shooting and not making the correct halftime adjustments. Stevens got completely outcoached by Calhoun in the second half. Switching to that zone when they were only down 7 or 8 was absolutely stupefying-- as poorly as they were shooting, they were only a couple of threes away from being back in it and they'd been stopping UConn all night. Once UConn started making easy buckets, it was all over.
I'm also not sure how the anyone can read the game as a referendum on systems and talent when UConn themselves only shot 35% from the floor. There was zero flow for either team. I'm not really sure what the different systems had to do with anything.
The stat I saw that stood out was Mack was 0-7 while being guarded by Lamb (bigger and more athletic than Mack) 4-8 when guarded by anyone else. And all the shots being blocked by the UCONN bigs (who were more athletic than the Butler bigs) had Howard and company shooting quick and altering their shot to avoid it being blocked.
I won't disagree that one game is not a referendum but the Butler we saw last night with 8 minute scoring draughts, being unable to penetrate a defense, and firing up 3s at the end of shot clocks looked very familiar.