I have looked at a few of the teams that are on our schedule and this is what I came up with roughly:
Ohio State: They are going to lose a lot of their receiving talent, more than likely Dobbins, and most of their starting defense if not all of it. They lose the most I think.
Penn State: Their offense will look a lot of the same way as this year, but they do lose a lot on the defensive line which was their strength this year.
Wisconsin: They will lose a generational player in Taylor, a lot on the offensive line.
Minnesota: running back depth and Tyler Johnson offense, and pretty much their entire defensive line and linebackers.
After that, Northwestern will still suck. Illinois will lose some players and have a veteran team, Purdue gets a lot of talent back from injury and Nebraska loses a lot on defense. Michigan State will lose a lot of that defense which was the best unit on the team although overrated.
I think the schedule will be the most challenging part of our season next year. The back to back road games at Ohio State and Penn State will be a challenge, although they are both very winnable. There are also road games at Minnesota and Purdue that will be challenging, but if we have any sort of offensive chemistry we should win these. We have to get Wisconsin this year and its at home, along with Nebraska and Iowa State.
I think the schedule will be the most challenging part of our season next year. The back to back road games at Ohio State and Penn State will be a challenge, although they are both very winnable. There are also road games at Minnesota and Purdue that will be challenging, but if we have any sort of offensive chemistry we should win these. We have to get Wisconsin this year and its at home, along with Nebraska and Iowa State.
The morons in the conference head office need to change the rules so the division winners are based first on division record, then on head to head, then on conference record. The fact that Minnesota would have won the division despite getting destroyed by Wisconsin had Iowa not held serve and beaten them is absurd. Wisconsin had to play at OSU.
OSU has lost one conference home game since the end of its disastrous 6-6 2011 season. One. In 8 years. MSU beat them by a field goal in horrible weather in November of 2015. In fact, if you throw out that fluke 2011 season for OSU and go all the way back to 2005, they have lost a grand total of 3 home games in conference play, the one to MSU, one to #3 PSU in 2008 (who subsequently lost at Iowa that year) and one to the Rose Bowl bound Illini team in 2007 when Locksley had landed all those stud recruits. So throwing out the outlier year of 2011, they have lost 3 conference home games in 14 freaking years. They just absolutely own the conference.
The morons in the conference head office need to change the rules so the division winners are based first on division record, then on head to head, then on conference record. The fact that Minnesota would have won the division despite getting destroyed by Wisconsin had Iowa not held serve and beaten them is absurd. Wisconsin had to play at OSU.
OSU has lost one conference home game since the end of its disastrous 6-6 2011 season. One. In 8 years. MSU beat them by a field goal in horrible weather in November of 2015. In fact, if you throw out that fluke 2011 season for OSU and go all the way back to 2005, they have lost a grand total of 3 home games in conference play, the one to MSU, one to #3 PSU in 2008 (who subsequently lost at Iowa that year) and one to the Rose Bowl bound Illini team in 2007 when Locksley had landed all those stud recruits. So throwing out the outlier year of 2011, they have lost 3 conference home games in 14 freaking years. They just absolutely own the conference.
Can I click and "Dislike" a premise in a thread to say yes you are right osu is really tough and the rest of the league needs to catch up to osu. Besides PSU, OSU has had two or three major violations, institutional problems in the last 10-12 years which is just another reason I dont like them when they play conference games, of course except when they are playing one of our West Div rivals.
The morons in the conference head office need to change the rules so the division winners are based first on division record, then on head to head, then on conference record. The fact that Minnesota would have won the division despite getting destroyed by Wisconsin had Iowa not held serve and beaten them is absurd. Wisconsin had to play at OSU.
OSU has lost one conference home game since the end of its disastrous 6-6 2011 season. One. In 8 years. MSU beat them by a field goal in horrible weather in November of 2015. In fact, if you throw out that fluke 2011 season for OSU and go all the way back to 2005, they have lost a grand total of 3 home games in conference play, the one to MSU, one to #3 PSU in 2008 (who subsequently lost at Iowa that year) and one to the Rose Bowl bound Illini team in 2007 when Locksley had landed all those stud recruits. So throwing out the outlier year of 2011, they have lost 3 conference home games in 14 freaking years. They just absolutely own the conference.
Thanks for the numbers backing up OSU being almost unbeatable at home. I knew they were tough out in the shoe, but I will be honest and didn't know they were that good there! Wow! Safe to say we wont be the favorite! LOL
Yes, but in all fairness, they don't lose often on the road either.
I agree that if you are going to have an east champ and a west champ, crossovers shouldn't matter, especially with the disparity in the divisions.
Just read an article that three Penn State underclassmen are considering leaving early including KJ Hamler. I think their top DE is for sure going early too and wasn’t even mentioned. If they lose a couple of those guys along with the expected losses, they could take a big step back on D, and Hamler was by far their best offensive playmaker.
Michigan State loses a lot on defense, which was their strength this year.
Ohio State loses a good deal but for reasons mentioned in this thread I’m not considering a win there to be even a possibility.