Honest question here.. In watching the review it did appear the ball never touched the Wisconsin player but as the ball sat on the field one of their other guys dove at the ball making contact with it, we obviously recovered. Couldn't hear a whistle but can't think it was blown dead did anyone else notice this?
Reviewed Punt
- Thread starter IARai8er
- Start date
A Wisky player did attempt to recover it by diving on it, however, an Iowa player dove on it at the same time and touched it first. Therefore, Wisky ball.
Eda
Well-Known Member
I thought the same thing when I seen the replay in the big screen at the game. When I went home and watched the game again, I still thought the same thing. I couldn't believe the announcers didn't same anything about that. The only comment they made was that it "obviously" didn't touch the first player. And it should be a "quick" review.
ICHawk24
Well-Known Member
That was my opinion. Everyone around us at the game thought it was for sure Wisky ball and I was waiting for a "shocking" announcement of Iowa ball. Oh well.
hawkfan340
Well-Known Member
I had this same idea, but I thought we touched it first according to the replay.
That was only the 4th worst outcome on a punt for the Hawks on the day.
Worst of all were the 2 punts the KMM allowed to hit the field at the 20 yard lines. both of them rolled inside the 5 and both of them resulted in a pick deep in our own end of the field.
The 3rd worst was the punt that Wisconsin actually muffed. Naturally we couldn't get on it and Wisky retained possession.
Worst of all were the 2 punts the KMM allowed to hit the field at the 20 yard lines. both of them rolled inside the 5 and both of them resulted in a pick deep in our own end of the field.
The 3rd worst was the punt that Wisconsin actually muffed. Naturally we couldn't get on it and Wisky retained possession.