QB:
1) Weinke
2) Sokol
3) Beutjer
4) Christensen
5) Manson
6) Petras
7) Ruddock
8) Tate/Stanzi/CJB/Banks/Stanley
9) Chandler
10) McCann
The coaching staff is full of idiots and they run off all the best QBs leaving behind scrubs who suck. We would have 3 Nattys if they didn't run off all the good QBs.
Nice trolling to start off this thread. Lmao!!
Yeah he is really playing along. Hijack
Seriously:
1. Tie - Banks and CJB - both have mobility, moxie, strong accurate arm with quick release, touch
2. Close to first is Drew Tate in 2004 and most of 2005, injured in 2006, same qualities as above
3. Ricky Stanzi - mobile and fast enough to get first downs, accurate, etc Junior year INTs a negative
4. Nathan Chandler - big strong, decent speed, accurate enough, made big throws
5. Nate Stanley - accuracy and lack of speed mobility are negatives
Rest are about the same but Christensen was pretty inaccurate.
What about players that never made it to Iowa? After all, the coaching staff is obviously actively avoiding trying to recruit good players.I forgot that Wiegers should be 4th on there so move everyone else down. Wiegers beat Purdue last year, something Nate Stanley couldn't do.
What about players that never made it to Iowa? After all, the coaching staff is obviously actively avoiding trying to recruit good players.
Doesn't get any worse than Jake the 5 feet in the Turf Snake and Kyle McCan't.
haha, Kyle McCant. Well McCann was serviceable and a good QB, led the offense to 7-5 and a bowl win. Four of the losses were very close and this team could have been like the 2003-4 squads. Perhaps KF needed to play Banks a little more and if the offense scores 3-7 more points per loss they win 10 games.
Banks needed to be the starter!!! That was blatantly obvious.
If the TE position is included that's interesting: Kittle, Hock, D. Clark, Fant, Moeaki, Chandler, Krieger-Koble, can't remember the rest.
Well McCann was serviceable and a good QB
Yeah, probably as the season wore on but Banks made some mistakes also. A big pick against Wisky and other posters have mentioned he ducked out of bounds late against Mich when they needed a yard for a first down.
Just one look at the qb list makes that painfully obvious to all but the homers like you. The second clue was the legendary move of sitting soon to be heisman runner up banks to kyle mccann but that’s what a ferentz doesWhat about players that never made it to Iowa? After all, the coaching staff is obviously actively avoiding trying to recruit good players.
You don’t freeze a future heisman talent the rest of the year for stepping out of bounds. If given the same play, mccann would have been sacked for 13 yards but ferentz is clueless when it comes to judging skill playersYeah, probably as the season wore on but Banks made some mistakes also. A big pick against Wisky and other posters have mentioned he ducked out of bounds late against Mich when they needed a yard for a first down.
He said 21 years so within the ferentz era. That cuts the list down significantlyCook, Flagg and Slutzker say hi. Plus that one guy who Kaldenberg said would be awesome. And Duzey was really good, too.
Saying Christensen was pretty inaccurate is like saying water is kinda wet or the sun is kinda hot. That guy would miss relievers 10 yards away by a hash mark......Yeah he is really playing along. Hijack
Seriously:
1. Tie - Banks and CJB - both have mobility, moxie, strong accurate arm with quick release, touch
2. Close to first is Drew Tate in 2004 and most of 2005, injured in 2006, same qualities as above
3. Ricky Stanzi - mobile and fast enough to get first downs, accurate, etc Junior year INTs a negative
4. Nathan Chandler - big strong, decent speed, accurate enough, made big throws
5. Nate Stanley - accuracy and lack of speed mobility are negatives
Rest are about the same but Christensen was pretty inaccurate.
Did you really forget about Eric McCollom?QB:
1) Weinke
2) Sokol
3) Beutjer
4) Christensen
5) Manson
6) Petras
7) Ruddock
8) Tate/Stanzi/CJB/Banks/Stanley
9) Chandler
10) McCann
The coaching staff is full of idiots and they run off all the best QBs leaving behind scrubs who suck. We would have 3 Nattys if they didn't run off all the good QBs.