One thing he gets wrong. He claims that JoePa should have immediately suspended the guy who did the assault on the kid...well, he was no longer working at PSU when this assault was witnessed. Sandusky left PSU in 1999,and this assualt was witnessed in 2002. I find many people are so angry about this,they get the facts wrong.
One thing he gets wrong. He claims that JoePa should have immediately suspended the guy who did the assault on the kid...well, he was no longer working at PSU when this assault was witnessed. Sandusky left PSU in 1999,and this assualt was witnessed in 2002. I find many people are so angry about this,they get the facts wrong.
Help. If he was not employed by Penn State at the time of the alledged (yeah, right) incident, then why was he in a shower room at Penn State? Did this assault occur somewhere else?[/QUOTEOne thing he gets wrong. He claims that JoePa should have immediately suspended the guy who did the assault on the kid...well, he was no longer working at PSU when this assault was witnessed. Sandusky left PSU in 1999,and this assualt was witnessed in 2002. I find many people are so angry about this,they get the facts wrong.
full access to the campus plus and office, part of his retirement deal with the Athletic Dept. the same ppl who knew of the 1998 incident. disgusting.
Help. If he was not employed by Penn State at the time of the alledged (yeah, right) incident, then why was he in a shower room at Penn State? Did this assault occur somewhere else?[/QUOTE
full access to the campus plus and office, part of his retirement deal with the Athletic Dept. the same ppl who knew of the 1998 incident. disgusting.
Let's not forget that the reason he was forced into retirement is because they knew he was a pedophile molesting boys in the showers at PSU.
Let's not forget that the reason he was forced into retirement is because they knew he was a pedophile molesting boys in the showers at PSU.
You can bet your @$$ I'll never forget it. And neither will the lawyers for these abused boys.