PRETENDERS II

damnfinn

Well-Known Member
Since Iowa has been called a pretender by some, lets look at all the other top ranked pretenders.

VILLANOVA:

lost @ home to Oklahoma 78-55
lost @ home to Providence 72-76
lost @ Virginia 86-75

MARYLAND:

lost @ UNC 89-81
lost @ unranked Mich. 70-67
lost @ MSU 74-65

OKLAHOMA:

lost @ KU 109-106
lost @ ISU 82-77
lost @ unranked KSU 80-69

XAVIER:

lost @ Villanova 95-64
lost @ unranked Georgetown 81-72
lost @ unranked Creighton 70-56

KANSAS:

lost @ home to MSU 79-73
lost @ WV 74-63
lost @ ISU 85-72
lost @ unranked Ok State 86-67

North CArolina:

lost @ to unranked UNI 71-97
lost to unranked TEX 84-82
lost to unranked Loiusville 71-65
lost to unranked Notre Dame 80-76

Virginia:
lost @ unranked George Washington 73-68
lost @ unranked Virginia Tech 70-68
lost @ unranked Georgia Tech 68-64
lost @ unranked FSU 69-62
 
None of those teams are pretenders -- they all suk and I don't expect anything from them. Hawks are better than all of them and need to act like it. When they don't, they are, by definition, pretenders.

:p
 
None of those teams are pretenders -- they all suk and I don't expect anything from them. Hawks are better than all of them and need to act like it. When they don't, they are, by definition, pretenders.

:p

Using your criteria and reasoning from this and the other 'Pretenders' thread, I can't find a team anywhere that qualifies as a contender. I guess there aren't any this year. :rolleyes:
 
Since Iowa has been called a pretender by some, lets look at all the other top ranked pretenders.

VILLANOVA:

lost @ home to Oklahoma 78-55
lost @ home to Providence 72-76
lost @ Virginia 86-75

MARYLAND:

lost @ UNC 89-81
lost @ unranked Mich. 70-67
lost @ MSU 74-65

OKLAHOMA:

lost @ KU 109-106
lost @ ISU 82-77
lost @ unranked KSU 80-69

XAVIER:

lost @ Villanova 95-64
lost @ unranked Georgetown 81-72
lost @ unranked Creighton 70-56

KANSAS:

lost @ home to MSU 79-73
lost @ WV 74-63
lost @ ISU 85-72
lost @ unranked Ok State 86-67

North CArolina:

lost @ to unranked UNI 71-97
lost to unranked TEX 84-82
lost to unranked Loiusville 71-65
lost to unranked Notre Dame 80-76

Virginia:
lost @ unranked George Washington 73-68
lost @ unranked Virginia Tech 70-68
lost @ unranked Georgia Tech 68-64
lost @ unranked FSU 69-62

Great list dates to these losses? Just curious if recently or not.
 
It's pretty cool that Iowa single handily eliminated 2 contenders. They did it so early in the year that they don't get enough credit for it. But if MSU would have swept iowa they might be number 1 in the nation still. If Purdue swept Iowa they would be top 10 and still playing for a 1 seed. Those are 2 really good teams we swept.
 
Wisky clobbering MD @ MD

Take one look at the Wisky game tonight and say no more. Steve is a genius once more. :p

To ensure themselves a 'lock down' #1 seed in the BTT or NCAAs, Iowa needs to take a game like this.

And for good measure, defeat, say a Minnesota, by about 35+ points tomorrow.

Can't strut in the rarefied air if you're gonna puss-out by being happy with "close is OK' on the road against top level talent.
 
I assume he wanted to know to see if their bad loses happened early. It doesn't matter so much for the arguement the op made but it does matter a little. I'm glad our loses to ND and Dayton came early as opposed to recently. It means our team is on more of a roll.
 
Let this be a lesson to the world!!!!Don't pizz off an interweb savvy hawk fan!!
 
Wisky clobbering MD @ MD

Take one look at the Wisky game tonight and say no more. Steve is a genius once more. :p

To ensure themselves a 'lock down' #1 seed in the BTT or NCAAs, Iowa needs to take a game like this.

And for good measure, defeat, say a Minnesota, by about 35+ points tomorrow.

Can't strut in the rarefied air if you're gonna puss-out by being happy with "close is OK' on the road against top level talent.

Thanks Seth...
I am not right often but when I am I have a crown my friend.
 
Top