POLL:: Challenges Iowa traditionally faces

BlckNGldHwk

Well-Known Member
List the top three callenges you feel Iowa football traditionally has to overcome in order to compete for the Big Ten title. Try to limit each item to a single sentence but be more informative than "recruiting" or "money".
 
Location is tough on recruiting and the population base to recruit from in the state makes our staff's job harder.
 
Lack of historical pedigree, which creates a lack of national interest.

Lack of access to skilled players, placing a huge premium on coaching and development, and leaving us with little room for error.

The state of Iowa itself is forgettable to much of the country, which effects both national interest and recruiting.
 
1. Does Iowa grow potatoes?

2. Iowa City is HOW BIG OF A TOWN?

3. Oh, and the fact Iowa produces about 10-15 BCS recruites per year.
 
#1 OSU They will always be our measuring stick. One day we'll figure them out.

#2 In-state population. Obviously a huge task for our recruiters is to go out and find the talent. We don't have that 'pool' to pick from most years.

#3 I don't pretend to know the financial side of things, but I would imagine that not having the immense alumni base donations that bigger schools have this puts a certain burden on the program. (I had trouble coming up with this last one. Good to know the program is in that good of shape!)
 
1. Population (smaller instate recuiting base)
2. National perception (or ignorance) of our state and campus
3. Sports media bias, automatic high rankings for teams like Florida, USC, Notre Dame, Texas etc. It would take consecutive 11-1 seasons for IOWA to get a preseason Top 5 ranking.
 
List the top three callenges you feel Iowa football traditionally has to overcome in order to compete for the Big Ten title. Try to limit each item to a single sentence but be more informative than "recruiting" or "money".

Are you a teacher? I'm not trying to be a smartass (my family is full of teachers) but your last sentence just makes me think that for some reason.
 
Lack of a national interest which is from lack of population in Iowa.

Recruiting is always difficult we don' t have a built in pipe line like some schools

Depth we just need more top line players year in and year out.
 
Okay, so the first 10 or so responses have yielded the following:

1. Iowa? - Lack of knowledge and interest regarding the state and university of Iowa leads to little to no national coverage causing reduced exposure to potential future recruits.

2. Lack of available talent - The population of Iowa and its surrounding states inherently limits the amount of talent that can be produced and is thus available to recruit. We simply do not have easy access to a population rich with talent.

3. $$$$ - Iowa doesn't have the financial backing of alumni compared to the likes of Ohio State, Michigan etc...

4. Ohio State, Michigan, Wisconsin - We compete in a conference with very talented teams and in order to be successful we must defeat those teams. Historically speaking, we are unable to consistently do so.

5. Injuries - With an already limited amount of talent on the roster, the effects of a single injury are multiplied compared to other teams with deep benches.


So here is my concern: These are the things we have been saying for years make it so much more difficult for Iowa to compete and be successful. It is the reason we love this team because when we do find a way to win it means that much more. It's the old addage, we have to work twice as hard to get half as far. We all know these struggles exist in the current structure of the conference.

Looking at our five main obstacles I don't see how a single one will be improved with the expansion of the conference. In fact, not only will they not improve, I think some of them will be multiplied dramatically. The most notable being 2 (lack of available talent) and 4 (conference competition).

If we are already struggling to gain recruits in the states surrounding us then adding Nebraska will only increase the amount of quality teams going after the already limited amount of talent that exists. Expanding out east, we might get a couple of players from out there but you don't think the likes of Penn State and Ohio State are going swipe up a lot of that talent?

Conference competition. I'm not dogging on our Hawks, but if we are struggling to break through on to the national scene because of teams like Ohio State, Michigan and Wisconsin...how much easier do you think it's going to be by adding teams like Nebraska, Notre Dame or god forbid Texas. If we can't win conference championships in the current make-up of the conference, what in the world makes us think we can prevail in an even more competitive one?

I love our Hawks and I'll bleed black and gold my whole life through, but I honestly don't see how conference expansion bodes well for our future success. Sure, we'll have more money in the bank...but look at teams like Northwestern and Illinois. Do we want to be rich or do we want to be successful?
 
Challenges
1. The size of Iowa/The Clowns piece of the pie. Iowa is smaller than every BCS state it touches except Nebraska but is also the only one with 2 public BCS Universities so in a state with 3 million people, splitting that pie hurts.
2. Always the bridesmaid and never the bride. Iowa football is filled with more what if's then anything. What if Harmon hadn't been paid off, What if Stanzi doesn't get hurt, What if Greedo didn't shoot first etc... Try as they might, Iowa never seems to break out nationally and hasn't won an outright title in 25 years.
3. Depth/injuries lol... Iowa can only get so many 4/5 star guys to come there. Losing players hurts but Iowa does the best they can with the guys they get.
 
Population (by far the smallest in B10, prior to Nebby)
Geography (weather & no beaches, oceans)
Perception (corn fields and hicks)
 
I don't think expansion hurts our current winning formula. We just need to realize that in order to compete, now and in the future, we need a coach that understands our disadvantages and adjusts accordingly.

Ferentz runs the perfect program for Iowa. He emphasizes and recruits for player development. He is successful at player development. The coaches do an excellent job at ensuring the team is fundamentally sound. Our "style" of play is adjusted to the conservative. Allow the undisciplined and poor teams to beat themselves, hang around with the talented teams. Don't give up big plays, don't turn the ball over, make the other team beat you.

As long as we play disciplined football, reduce errors, and develop players we will aways be a successful program. Too many other coaches are too poor at instilling these traits and they will beat themselves. The key is what happens when Ferentz moves on, I would really be in favor of hiring someone with Iowa/Ferentz ties.
 

Latest posts

Top