His first order of business would be to cut every former Hawkeye from the team.
No it wouldn't. It would be a disaster. Most of the college coaches who make the jump end up inheriting inherently flawed teams that have problems far beyond coaching. Green Bay is exactly that. Rodgers makes too much and it will hinder the team for the foreseeable future. The next coach will be unceremoniously fired after 2 or 3 bad to mediocre seasons.If he was ever going to make the jump to the NFL now would be the time ... that would be a great opportunity for him.
No it wouldn't. It would be a disaster. Most of the college coaches who make the jump end up inheriting inherently flawed teams that have problems far beyond coaching. Green Bay is exactly that. Rodgers makes too much and it will hinder the team for the foreseeable future. The next coach will be unceremoniously fired after 2 or 3 bad to mediocre seasons.
There have been a lot of college who made the jump and sucked. Pete Carroll (more of an NFL guy) did fine and Jimmy Johnson did fine because he inherited a young team that got a windfall in the Walker trade. But a lot of college guys have gotten totally burned trying to make the job. Even Nick got burned walking into that tire fire at Miami. Nick is arguably the best college coach ever (I say arguably because perhaps Bear was his equal) and he got run out of the NFL right away.
If I were Fitz, the only way I would take a head NFL job is if it was a situation similar to Cleveland, the Rams or Chiefs where I had a good young QB making rookie salary scale money and there was an immediate window to be good.
I don't disagree that the jump from a successful P5 college program to the NFL can be difficult and has far less job security. On the other hand, he's probably done about all he can at Northwestern and if he ever is interested in trying out the NFL, now would be the time to go because he's a hot commodity. If he tries and fails, he could always go back to a college job and find plenty of takers. You are rarely going to walk in to the perfect position and have perfect timing in the NFL, that's why the previous coach got fired. He is one of the lower paid coaches in the B1G, my guess is he gets a salary bump and stays in Evanston, assuming he has an agent worth his salt.No it wouldn't. It would be a disaster. Most of the college coaches who make the jump end up inheriting inherently flawed teams that have problems far beyond coaching. Green Bay is exactly that. Rodgers makes too much and it will hinder the team for the foreseeable future. The next coach will be unceremoniously fired after 2 or 3 bad to mediocre seasons.
There have been a lot of college who made the jump and sucked. Pete Carroll (more of an NFL guy) did fine and Jimmy Johnson did fine because he inherited a young team that got a windfall in the Walker trade. But a lot of college guys have gotten totally burned trying to make the job. Even Nick got burned walking into that tire fire at Miami. Nick is arguably the best college coach ever (I say arguably because perhaps Bear was his equal) and he got run out of the NFL right away.
If I were Fitz, the only way I would take a head NFL job is if it was a situation similar to Cleveland, the Rams or Chiefs where I had a good young QB making rookie salary scale money and there was an immediate window to be good.
Rodgers would probably urinate on Patty.......that would be his opinion of the move.
No it wouldn't. It would be a disaster. Most of the college coaches who make the jump end up inheriting inherently flawed teams that have problems far beyond coaching. Green Bay is exactly that. Rodgers makes too much and it will hinder the team for the foreseeable future. The next coach will be unceremoniously fired after 2 or 3 bad to mediocre seasons.
There have been a lot of college who made the jump and sucked. Pete Carroll (more of an NFL guy) did fine and Jimmy Johnson did fine because he inherited a young team that got a windfall in the Walker trade. But a lot of college guys have gotten totally burned trying to make the job. Even Nick got burned walking into that tire fire at Miami. Nick is arguably the best college coach ever (I say arguably because perhaps Bear was his equal) and he got run out of the NFL right away.
If I were Fitz, the only way I would take a head NFL job is if it was a situation similar to Cleveland, the Rams or Chiefs where I had a good young QB making rookie salary scale money and there was an immediate window to be good.
Fitzgerald's name came up immediately due to his connections to Mark Murphy. It's not out of the realm of possibility, but, I doubt he's high on their list.
If they look to the college ranks, my guess would be Lincoln Riley or Dabo Swinney, both of which probably would just use that as leverage to get better deals locally. I don't see them going after Kelly. His personality wouldn't play well in GB. Jeff Tedford is a wildcard. He's got a proven record of success, and Rodgers by all accounts loved playing for him. Also, his name hasn't come up yet, but I'd keep an eye on Brohm.
At the end of the day, I still think it will be a current coordinator, such as Matt LeFleur, Pete Carmichael or Josh McDaniels.
McDaniels is the sexy pick. He's a good example of the Peter Principle, though. I'm not sure he has the right make-up for a HC. He's better off having a defined role as a coordinator.This hire is all about Aaron Rodgers. The Packers have to treat this as if they were hiring a long term NBA head coach. He better be able to get AR respect and get it quickly, otherwise AR will just do his own thing and you are back to where you were with McCarthy. Brian Kelly's resume doesn't scream respect, but he wouldn't be afraid to challenge AR. Who cares about his personality placating well to the fan base and to some local beat writers.
It is a tricky hire, if they can't get Josh McDaniels.
McDaniels is the sexy pick. He's a good example of the Peter Principle, though. I'm not sure he has the right make-up for a HC. He's better off having a defined role as a coordinator.
I think narrative of using Aaron Rodgers as the litmus test is being played a bit too much. He's already stated that he's not involved in the process in any way, and I believe him. Certainly, they are going to want to find a coach that melds well with their star QB, but, Packers management historically is very measured in these kinds of decisions, so there's a lot more than just Rodgers that goes into the equation. Saying that Aaron is running the show makes for good hyperbolic fodder on forums, but that's simply not the way the Packers roll (just ask Brett Favre).
As for Kelly, it's not just about placating the fans. It's about cultural fit. His style of treating his players like they are kids wouldn't sit well with NFL veterans. I do agree, though, that he wouldn't be afraid of getting in Aaron's face at times.
I still think IF they are looking at the college ranks, that Riley is the primary target, with Swinney and perhaps Brohm in the mix. They are all task masters that have solid offensive minds, that also quickly bond with players.