Ohio St (Replay Officials)

[hawksr12004]

It sure seems to me like OSU gets everything reviewed upstairs by the replay booth where
it could possibly overturn positive plays by OSU and Oregon get's things reviewed automatically that can help them. I sure hope the Big XII replay officials aren't biased.

 

[HawkeyeShane]

Quick...give us some examples.

 

[kuhntz]

Quick...give us some examples.

Watch the NW v Aurburn game and you might understand.

If I had recorded the game I would have broken it down and given you exact examples but I didn't plan to record NW/Auburn. Sorry. It was boardering on ridiculous in that game.

As for the Rose Bowl, I was busy with work and only had it on in the background, but to assume the OP is wearing B10 colored glasses...you might want to rewatch some of these games.

 

[HawkeyeShane]

Watch the NW v Aurburn game and you might understand.

If I had recorded the game I would have broken it down and given you exact examples but I didn't plan to record NW/Auburn. Sorry. It was boardering on ridiculous in that game.

As for the Rose Bowl, I was busy with work and only had it on in the background, but to assume the OP is wearing B10 colored glasses...you might want to rewatch some of these games.

I watched the Outback until the Cap1 started, then flipped back to it during commercials...so while I didn't notice any type of "hijinx" going on, I can't say there wasn't any...but there didn't seem to be any during the Cap1 and as for the Rose Bowl, the reason there wasn't the same level of reviews on both sides was because of Oregon's offense, they were always quick to the line and quick to snap the ball...it sucked, but those have always been the rules, "snap the ball before the booth calls down and they can't review the play"...so while I was also watching with Big10 glasses on, I didn't notice anything odd "going against the conference" in the game...that's why I wanted examples from the game the OP was speaking of.