Where has that been. Is this 2011 Pitt game. Go hawks
P PCHawk Well-Known Member Nov 9, 2019 #3 You see it time and again with teams going no huddle and being able to move the ball.
H hawkinstl Well-Known Member Nov 9, 2019 #4 Correct me if I’m wrong, but they went no huddle only 2 possessions this game. And they scored a TD on both of them. Why not more of this? The answer is simple. It’s Kirk Ferentz who doesn’t want to do it. Just sad for the players.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but they went no huddle only 2 possessions this game. And they scored a TD on both of them. Why not more of this? The answer is simple. It’s Kirk Ferentz who doesn’t want to do it. Just sad for the players.
X Xerxes Well-Known Member Nov 9, 2019 #5 The only time Iowa went no huddle was on their 1st TD drive and it wasn't even no huddle the entire time. They huddled their last 3 plays. It wasn't the no huddle. They just started spreading it out and passing more. Its what smart coaches do against teams with weak DBs like Wisconsin.
The only time Iowa went no huddle was on their 1st TD drive and it wasn't even no huddle the entire time. They huddled their last 3 plays. It wasn't the no huddle. They just started spreading it out and passing more. Its what smart coaches do against teams with weak DBs like Wisconsin.
dahlhawk Well-Known Member Nov 10, 2019 #6 More important is putting Stanley in shotgun. He is just too slow to play action and set up. Spreading out the offense would be the most helpful thing Iowa could do right now.
More important is putting Stanley in shotgun. He is just too slow to play action and set up. Spreading out the offense would be the most helpful thing Iowa could do right now.