HomerChampless
Well-Known Member
At the beginning of each NBA finals game, OKC suffered dry spells leading to 'uphill climbs' for the Thunder the rest of the game.
OKC is more effective than Miami scoring fast break points. IMO, OKC looks to be more effective scoring points running a fast break offense. At least, not so much of a set offense.
To lessen the possibility of a dry spell at the beginnings of game 3, OKC should start the game with more fast break sets.
Miami could, however, be adjusting to OKC's superiority in fast break points. The Thunder scored 13 fewer fast break points in game 2. From 24 to 11 points.
Game 1 OKC 24 fbpoints.
Miami 4 fbpoints.
Game 2 OKC 11 fbpoints.
Miami 10 fbpoints.
OKC is more effective than Miami scoring fast break points. IMO, OKC looks to be more effective scoring points running a fast break offense. At least, not so much of a set offense.
To lessen the possibility of a dry spell at the beginnings of game 3, OKC should start the game with more fast break sets.
Miami could, however, be adjusting to OKC's superiority in fast break points. The Thunder scored 13 fewer fast break points in game 2. From 24 to 11 points.
Game 1 OKC 24 fbpoints.
Miami 4 fbpoints.
Game 2 OKC 11 fbpoints.
Miami 10 fbpoints.