Losing in the NCAA

[sportstalent]

Losing in the NCAA does NOT mean:

The team is over-rated and doesn't belong in the tournament.
The conference is over-rated and shouldn't have that many teams in the tournament.
The coach is incompetent.
The coach is an @$$hole.
The committee is clueless.

It especially doesn't mean that Iowa should have been in the tournament. I agree there is a good case for that, but it has nothing to do with who loses and who doesn't in the dance.

What is DOES mean is:

Upsets happen.
It's amazing how much parity is in the college game.

What's my point? Try to make your comments sound like you know a little about the college game. Thank you.

I will agree with one thing there is parity in the college game. However, the rest of you blubber is not entirely true.

There are coaches that show that they are bad game managers, or in game coaches every year, no shame in calling that out.
There are many ****** who are coaches, sometimes they reveal themselves more in the NCAA tournament.
The committee shows their agenda every year during the tournament, just look at the last 10 teams that get in and see who they are and what they do.
Actually, the NCAA tournament can reveal a lot about programs, it exposes flaws and if you are a program/coach who can't learn from losses then it continues to happen in the NCAA tournament.
There is a reason some of the Elite programs are Elite and it starts mainly with the guys on the bench.

 

[mrolympia]

This op needs alot of this:
Anti Monkey Butt Powder

or this: