Lickliter Handled Tucker Situation Well

JonDMiller

Publisher/Founder
Iowa sports information released a statement on Friday morning saying that guard Anthony Tucker has been granted his release from his scholarship. This means that other schools can contact him about transferring within the rules of the NCAA. It also means that Tucker’s rocky career as a Hawkeye has come to an end.

Tucker burst onto the scene last year as a true freshman, leading Iowa in scoring through the first third of the season. He showed a penchant for hitting the long ball and could take over a game when he got hot. But he was found passed out in an alley behind an Iowa City bar and was suspended from the team. He never got a chance to be reinstated from that because he was ruled academically ineligible for the second semester.

His teammates rallied around him, as did the coaching staff, showing support. Iowa gave him a second chance this year and Tucker seemed to appreciate it in his words, but unfortunately, not in his deeds as he was arrested on another alcohol related charge just two months ago. Tucker has not played since then, though he did dress for Iowa’s game against Northwestern.

Todd Lickliter never gave any timeline as to when or even if Tucker would play again this year, or ever. Lickliter stated on several occasions that they were looking out for the best interests of Tucker, and if that meant basketball was not involved, they were fine with that.

I believe that Todd Lickliter and the University of Iowa did indeed look out for Anthony’s best interests. Tucker is a talented player and Iowa is not a deep team. They certainly could have used his basketball skills, but at what cost? Was that the best thing for Anthony, or the best thing for the team? Lickliter didn’t try putting a bandaid on a compound fracture. He stuck to his guns.

You can say what you want about Iowa’s success, or lack there of, on the court during the past three seasons, and many of you have, as have I. But I don’t think anyone can question Lickliter’s handing of this situation. I don’t think we can say he is unfair, or uncaring, not that anyone has. I think he and Iowa did a good job here, and I hope the players on the team see that. They are certainly playing with a team first mentality, which is what Lickliter demands.

In the end, some will point to this as another mark against the Lickliter era.

So far, I think it stands out to me as one of the best moments, where people and what is in their best interest was put before potential tally marks in the win column.
 
Jon, I agree that Lickliter handled this well, however, the lack of depth at the guard position this now leaves is troubling. While I don't hold Tucker's departure against Lick, his inability to fill the needs of his team and inability to recruit is where I do hold Lick accountable. Heading into a critical year in 2010-2011 for Lick, it seems only logical he will need to fill this position. If he does nothing and "banks" on holding it until 2011 and the team struggles once again, then I would say Lick handle the aftermath of Tucker poorly! He is responsible for the success of this team and for the sake of his job he would be wise to fill the scholarship NOW!
 
Not sure if it is a mark against Lickliter but players leaving under him continues to be a massive problem. His fault or not that is a big problem with the demise of Iowa basketball to levels this wonderful program has never seen.
 
Jon, do you think the long-lasting fallout from the Pierre Pierce situation impacted how Lickliter handled Tucker?
 
Jon and AZ, I usually think you guys are spot on most of the time so help me out here. It appears to me that Lickliter forced Tucker to play his hand (or Tucker's mother, whatever). I think I would have preferred that the coach made the decision, one way or the other. If he wanted Anthony back, I wish he would have come out and stated something to that effect and that he looked forward to having him next year or something. Probably not too big a deal, but something about the way it went down rubs me the wrong way a bit.
 
I agree with Parquet. Tucker complied with the requirements for reinstatement to the basketball team. However, what additional conditions did Coach Lickliter impose? I do not have any problems with additional criteria. But, I do have a problem if the additional requirements were not completely explained to and understood by Tucker.

I do not even want to get into the possible legal ramifications if Coach Lickliter did not impose specific, definite additional conditions.
 
Jon, do you think the long-lasting fallout from the Pierre Pierce situation impacted how Lickliter handled Tucker?

Clearly, the PP incident exposed the lack of written standardized university and athletic dept policies that made that situation so difficult to administer.

Since they have cleaned up the written policies that now will protect themselves from lawsuits that could have occurred if they handled the first PP incident differently, there have been other incidents(like the football players rape case) where it was pretty cut and dried and took decision-making out of the hands of the coaches and AD...thankfully.

As for Tucker, I agree that he was handled fairly,and properly by Lick and Iowa. My only gripe is that Lick added him in the first place...he had time to recruit better than Brommer and Tucker in that 08 class, and he settled for less than stellar players....which exposed his lack of recruiting chops right away.
 
One of the issues that I see on here is that everyone assumes that we can recruit better players than what we have, and that isn't necessarily how it works.
 
Jon and AZ, I usually think you guys are spot on most of the time so help me out here. It appears to me that Lickliter forced Tucker to play his hand (or Tucker's mother, whatever). I think I would have preferred that the coach made the decision, one way or the other. If he wanted Anthony back, I wish he would have come out and stated something to that effect and that he looked forward to having him next year or something. Probably not too big a deal, but something about the way it went down rubs me the wrong way a bit.
Exactly I really think he looks worse...why keep him on if you weren't going to play him. JUST MY OPINION...and it ain't worth much.
 
I honestly dont know what to think here. Without knowing exactly what happened its impossible to know.

Did Tuck let Lickliter down or not do something he was supposed to?

Did Lick change his mind or not follow through with what he told Tuck?

without knowing these questions i cant know for sure if this was handled properly. I guess its possible that both decided it wasnt going to work and decided to move on.
 
I respectfully disagree. Why suit this kid up and then not play him. I think TL was forcing his hand and is glad he is gone. I for one would have liked to see him get one more chance and use him as a backup PG and shooting guard.
For all you people who are qucik to dismiss this kid think back and think hom many dumb things you did and didn't get caught.. but for the grace of god go I...
 
I respectfully disagree. Why suit this kid up and then not play him. I think TL was forcing his hand and is glad he is gone. I for one would have liked to see him get one more chance and use him as a backup PG and shooting guard.
For all you people who are qucik to dismiss this kid think back and think hom many dumb things you did and didn't get caught.. but for the grace of god go I...

I never had a full-ride scholly to a Big 10 school either.
 
Anthony let the team down twice. But he was not kicked the curb, he didn't lost his scholarship, people didnt turn their backs on him...but there was a price to pay.

That sounds a lot like good parenting, and good mentoring. My dad still loved me after my DUI, but there was a price I had to pay, punishment. That was consistent for my entire life living at home. Love, support, but there are consequences for actions.

Tucker is a man, and he made choices...twice...to drink underage during the season, putting that ahead of his team. He also made the choice to not take school as seriously as needed. Iowa still supported him because they made a commitment to him, they didn't just divorce him at the first sign of trouble. But there were consequences to his actions.

He had not earned back Todd's trust just yet, and I don't blame Todd one bit. I think a lot of people would have kicked Anthony off the team...and that would have been within Todd's right, too...but I think he did what he thought was best for Anthony.

Anthony had to know he was not going to play until at the least, the second semester had started...so Anthony came back to Iowa this semester knowing that would be the case...I don't think he was misled in the least bit.

I admire Todd for how he handled this situation
 
Last edited:
I respectfully disagree. Why suit this kid up and then not play him. I think TL was forcing his hand and is glad he is gone. I for one would have liked to see him get one more chance and use him as a backup PG and shooting guard.

for those of you who wanted AT to play against northwestern... when should he have played? whose minutes should he have taken?

yes, we could have pulled all of our starters in the last three minutes, but lick chose not to. that decision didn't just affect AT but also cougill, brommer, and john. regardless, were three minutes of garbage time really going to make tucker happy? and if not, when should he have played? john lickliter got four minutes-- was that role going to make AT happy?

maybe AT thought that lickliter was going to design his whole gameplan around working him back onto the floor and just realized that wasn't the case. i'm not sure you can fault lick for sticking with the guys who were playing well and that hadn't been arrested seven weeks ago.
 
He had not earned back Todd's trust just yet, and I don't blame Todd one bit. I think a lot of people would have kicked Anthony off the team...and that would have been within Todd's right, too...but I think he did what he thought was best for Todd.

Jon, good response. Did you mean Todd or Anthony here?
 
I certainly don't have all the information but to me it looks like he forced Tucker's hand by being passive-agrressive with him. Let him suit up but don't play him. Again I don't have all the information.

Perhaps he told him that he wasn't going to get to play anymore this year except mop up minutes? Perhaps he said if he was patient he would get back into games. Perhaps he didn't say anything and Tucker read stuff into it that he shouldn't have. If that is the case, that wasn't fair to Tucker.

I would hope that Lickliter layed out exactly what conditions he expected Tucker to meet before he got to play again and whether he would get to play again. If he wasn't going to get to play again, I would certainly hope that he told Tucker that or Lickliter was being very dishonest with him. In other words, if Lickliter did not lay out everything plainly in black and white and made it look like he was going to play only never played him then Lickliter was very dishonest with him.

But then I don't have all the information just like none of you do so it is all a moot point. It is just strange how everything played out with Tucker meeting all the requirements, suiting up and this happening. To me it just appears to be some passive-aggressiveness going on and Tucker basically being forced out. But that is how it appears to me...

Hello Tony Freeman...
 

Latest posts

Top