eyekwah
Well-Known Member
After football season 1 for Texas A&M it sure looks like it was a good move. Beating Alabama, a Heisman candidate, and BCS bowl dwarf what UT Austin has done this season. UT Austin fans may be having the same feelings some of us Iowa fans are feeling after such a disappointing season. The Longhorn nation has to be gauging what happens if A&M goes on to have future success.
List the future games on A&M's schedule and compare them to the games on UT's schedule. The only standout game for Texas is with Oklahoma and a non-conference tilt here and there. While games with Baylor and TCU might be talk about games in Texas they don't move the needle to an LSU vs A&M or Alabama vs A&M. Hopefully you see the point. Does the argument if you want to be the best play against the best, win a recruit over?
I ran across an article by Barry Trammel from an OK newspaper last night where he points out that the Big 12 may need to add an 11th team and go to a 10 game conference schedule. In it he pointed out the so few non-conference games of interest played by the Big 12 and how the TV contract will require better games than those currently being offered by the members. He cited the Iowa vs ISU series as an exception. I cite this as evidence that UT Austin is not going to tolerate being second fiddle in Texas.
The Big 12 needs the University of Texas, but will Longhorn nation tolerate being in a conference that can't provide the platform for the national recognition it wants?
List the future games on A&M's schedule and compare them to the games on UT's schedule. The only standout game for Texas is with Oklahoma and a non-conference tilt here and there. While games with Baylor and TCU might be talk about games in Texas they don't move the needle to an LSU vs A&M or Alabama vs A&M. Hopefully you see the point. Does the argument if you want to be the best play against the best, win a recruit over?
I ran across an article by Barry Trammel from an OK newspaper last night where he points out that the Big 12 may need to add an 11th team and go to a 10 game conference schedule. In it he pointed out the so few non-conference games of interest played by the Big 12 and how the TV contract will require better games than those currently being offered by the members. He cited the Iowa vs ISU series as an exception. I cite this as evidence that UT Austin is not going to tolerate being second fiddle in Texas.
The Big 12 needs the University of Texas, but will Longhorn nation tolerate being in a conference that can't provide the platform for the national recognition it wants?