IowaLaw's Post Game Analysis: Holiday Bowl

IowaLawWasRight

Well-Known Member
A 49-24 win against a blue blood to cap off a 10 win season is the best way to ease the pain of going the next 8 months without Hawkeye football. While the refs randying around didn't do Iowa any favors, having USC down to their 3rd string QB was a huge break. Perhaps most encouraging is who stepped up to make the win happen. In particular:

1. Brian Ferentz - It's a rare day when IowaLaw applauds the coach's son for a job well done, but today's game plan (worst first play of the game ever aside) was impeccable. The misdirection, play calls against tendency, and aggressive offense was exactly what was needed to beat a team with superior athletes. Where were those jet sweeps to Smith-Marsette and Tracy and pitches to Goodson all year? No audibles to a run up the middle with 8 men in the box. The Hawks DO have the horses to score points (contrary to posters making excuses in the past that Iowa simply "doesn't want to score a bunch of points"). Let's build on this as a blue print for future play calling

2. Stanley - Nate was still Nate, but he played to the best of his abilities. His accuracy was as good as we've seen, 18/27 for 213, but his yards were mediocre (Slovis threw for 260 playing just 1/2 the game). He showed the cannon for an arm that he's had all along, zipping balls the way only an NFL bound QB can. His play clock unawareness remained clueless (2 more unexplainable delay of games). He fumbled, and had some bad misses to open receivers, but all in all, Nate put the ball where it needed to go against a ranked opponent. He gained the tough yards on sneaks that sealed the game. Three bowl wins is not a feat that many QBs in our lifetime will achieve, so let's give Nate his due. He's going to be near the top of Iowa's record books for decades to come.

3. Running game - I'm not sure Iowa has had a back that people love so much who produced so little. We all see the potential in Goodson, but 18 rushes for 48 yards is not one for the highlight reel. Is it all on the OL? Probably not. Is it the scheme? Maybe. I would have loved to see more of what Young could do this year (just 4 rushes for 18 yards today). Like Derrick Mitchell in years past, he led the team in yards per carry in pretty much every game he saw touches, but Kirk never seemed to want him to play. My guess is either Young or Sargent bids farewell, as there just aren't enough carries to go around.

4. Smith-Marsette - USC may have had the 2018 recruiting class's #1 overall recruit in WR St. Brown (9 catches for 163 yards), and a first round draft pick WR, but Smith-Marsette was the best offensive player on the field today. How arrogant to kick to him over and over. On offense, his 46 yards receiving and 15 yards aren't eye popping, but his 2 offensive touchdowns in the first half give hope that, for the first time since DJK and McNutt, the Hawks could have one of the best WR corps in the Big 10 next year (assuming Martin is playing over Ragaini, who had 2 more drops today). We are going to need elite WRs to help a QB who didn't throw a meaningful pass all year.

5. LaPorta - 6 targets, 6 catches, 44 yards. That's a solid stat line for a senior tight end. LaPorta is an 18 yr old true freshmen who didn't have a pass thrown to him until the second half of the season. This guy will be starting next year, and winning the Macky Award as a junior. He's got a knack for getting open and has better hands than most of the WRs on the team. He's going to put on 5 pounds between now and fall, so the sky is the limit.

6. AJE - It's been fun to watch the only 5 star recruit in decades. While I'd love to see him return next year, and he's just the kind of level headed star that might consider it, I think we've seen the last of AJE in a Hawkeye uniform. Two years in a row with double digit, the first to accomplish that since Matt Roth, and plenty more QB disruptions that would never show up on the stat sheet. Today, he had 4 tackles, with 2.5 sacks. While AJE was a legacy recruit, perhaps it's time for the Hawks to start mining Polynesian talent more often. The rosters at the top Pac 12 schools like USC, Washington, and Utah are loaded with them, and if AJE loved his time at Iowa, surely others could follow.
 
Last edited:
USC jumped into a 6 man defensive front quite a few times last night. They have a really great D Tackle which I was unaware of before the game, and they have the speed to shut down outside zone so I am not surprised the hawks didnt run for a ton of yards with the backs. But the hawks did get some big run plays like Sargent's 19 yards on a 3rd and long sort of delay draw play that surprised SC. USC didnt play good backside contain defense so the reverse calls were great and added in some great yardage.

Nate at 67% with at least one throw away and a few bad throws (scratch your head) was very good. Ragaini had a couple of drops one of which was not a well throw ball when he was wide open but at the same time Ragaini also made a few very nice catches. Laporta and Beyer will be even better next year and Beyer can scoot up the hash marks well enough that we can hurt teams from a two TE alignment.

Hawks graded out as an A with me in all facets of the game except both sides of the punt game.
 
A 49-24 bowl game win against a blue blood to cap off a 10 win season is the best possible way to ease the pain of going the next 8 months without Hawkeye football. While the refs didn't do Iowa any favors, having USC down to their 3rd string QB was a huge break. Perhaps most encouraging today is which individuals stepped up to make the win happen. In particular:

1. Brian Ferentz - It's a rare day when IowaLaw applauds the coach's son for a job well done, but today's game plan (first play of the game aside) was impeccable. The misdirection, play calls against tendency, and aggressive offense was exactly what was needed to beat a fitness team with superior athletes. Where were those jet sweeps to Smith-Marsette and Tracy and pitches to Goodson all year? What we learned today was that the Hawks DO have the horses to score points...moving forward, let's build on this as a blue print for play calling for years to come.

2. Stanley - Nate was still Nate, but he played to the best of his abilities. His accuracy was as good as we've seen all season, 18/27 for 213 (Slovis threw for 260 playing just 1/2 the game). He showed the cannon for an arm that he's had all along, zipping balls the way only an NFL bound QB can. For reasons that I'll never understand, his play clock unawareness remained at level clueless (had 2 delay of games where he was oblivious, but the coaches called timeout to save him). He fumbled, and had some bad misses to open receivers, but all in all, Nate put the ball where it needed to go against a ranked opponent and gained the tough yards on sneaks that sealed the game. Three bowl wins is not a feat that many QBs in our lifetime will achieve, so let's give Nate his due. He's going to be near the top of Iowa's record books for decades to come.

3. Running game - I'm not sure Iowa has had a back that people love so much who produced so little. We all see the potential in Goodson and know he's going to be a stud, but today's 18 rushes for 48 yards is not one for the highlight reel. Is it all on the OL? Probably not, given Iowa has 2 NFL tackles, plus a center that the staff loves. Is it the scheme? Maybe. But at the end of the day, I would have loved to see more of what Young could do this year (just 4 rushes for 18 yards today), as he has led the team in yards per carry in pretty much every game he saw touches, but never seemed to find his way in Brian's "in crowd." My guess is either Young or Sargent bids farewell after the season is over, as there just aren't enough carries to go around.

4. Smith-Marsette - USC may have had the 2018 recruiting class's #1 overall recruit in WR St. Brown (9 catches for 163 yards), and a first round draft pick WR on the other side, but Smith-Marsette was the best offensive player on the field today. How arrogant of USC to kick to kick to him with a weak legged kicker? They paid the price with a 98 yard momentum changing return for a TD. On offense, his 46 yards receiving and 15 yards aren't necessarily eye popping, but his 2 offensive touchdowns in the first half give us hope that, for the first time since DJK and McNutt, the Hawks could have one of the best WR corps in the Big 10 next year (assuming Martin is playing over Ragaini, who had 2 more drops today). We are going to need elite WRs, as next year's QB didn't throw a meaningful pass all year.

5. LaPorta - 6 targets, 6 catches, 44 yards. That's a solid stat line for a senior tight end. LaPorta is an 18 yr old true freshmen who has only scratched the surface of his potential. This guy will be starting next year, and winning the Macky Award as a junior. He's got a knack for getting open and has better hands than most of the WRs on the team. If he can block, look out! He's going to put on 5 pounds between now and fall, so the sky is the limit.

6. AJE - It's been fun to watch the only 5 star recruit that I can remember playing for the Hawks in my lifetime. While I'd love to see him return next year, and he's just the kind of level headed star that might consider it, I think we've seen the last of AJE in a Hawkeye uniform. Two years in a row with double digit, the first to accomplish that since Matt Roth, and plenty more QB disruptions that would never show up on the stat sheet. Today, he had 4 tackles, with 2.5 sacks. While AJE was a legacy recruit, perhaps it's time for the Hawks to start mining Polynesian talent more often. The rosters at the top Pac 12 schools like USC, Washington, and Utah are loaded with them, and if AJE loved his time at Iowa, surely others could follow.
I think these are pretty accurate comments overall. The yards gained were nearly the same, but Iowa's long drives made it a battle of attrition, which USC did not enjoy!

Stating the obvious (but still enjoying the win) a game like this leaves you wondering why such creative play calling, to avoid the opponent's strengths, just isn't there when it is needed...like PSU, WI, MI. Then it is a predictable, miserable, struggle.

It was a great game by Brian (or was it Kirk) to decide to NOT sit on the lead, but take risks to sustain drives and keep the wildly talented USC receivers on the bench for long stretches.

Nate played well, but he does drift into "brain-lock" at times...where the game is going faster than his brain. Perhaps in the NFL he can get to the point where QBs say, "The game is slowing down for me."

Hopefully Santa will be kind to Iowa and we will see many surprises, of Hawkeyes loving Iowa so much, and seeing so much returning talent that they want to stay for another season!

And Santa deliver a talented and accurate QB to run "this engine."

Would have loved to see Marsett get a TD by the run, receiving, kick off return, AND passing! Great game by him, how often have Iowa fans seen an Iowa skill player run by and away from PAC 10 players?
 
Last edited:
We will return the deepest pool of receivers we have seen at Iowa since 2002. That has gotta help the run game as teams will pay for stacking the box.

LaPorta made one huge third down catch that stuck out in my mind. Stanley was under duress and, in my opinion, was simply throwing it away, only it sailed on him because of the pressure up the middle. LaPorta channeled his inner Dwight Clark to get up and make the catch and keep the drive alive.

We would eventually march down the field in methodical fashion, consume time, and take the starch out of USC. It was the drive where Goodson iced it with his TD and made it 35-24, but if we end up putting there, it's game on and USC has full momentum.

On a side note. How much real time was our offense on the sideline? You had the ISM return, then we had one more scoring drive. But other than that it was USC possession, then FG, then TD coming out for second half, then inside kick, which fortunately ended in a punt. But our offense was barely on the field for well over an hour of real time.

It was also huge to not let them get six at the end of the half when they were threatening. They had to settle for three. That was huge.
 
I think these are pretty accurate comments overall. The yards game were nearly the same, but Iowa's long drives made it a battle of attrition, which USC did not enjoy!

Stating the obvious (but still enjoying the win) a game like this leaves you wondering why such creative play calling, to avoid the opponent's strengths, just isn't there when it is needed...like PSU, WI, MI. Then it is a predictable, miserable, struggle.

It was a great game by Brian (or was it Kirk) to decide to NOT sit on the lead, but take risks to sustain drives and keep the wildly talented USC receivers on the bench for long stretches.

Nate played well, but he does drift into "brain-lock" at times...where the game is going faster than his brain. Perhaps in the NFL he can get to the point where QBs say, "The game is slowing down for me."

Hopefully Santa will be kind to Iowa and we will see many surprises, of Hawkeyes loving Iowa so much, and seeing so much returning talent that they want to stay for another season!

And Santa deliver a talented and accurate QB to run "this engine."

Would have loved to see Marsett get a TD by the run, receiving, kick off return, AND passing! Great game by him, how often have Iowa fans seen an Iowa skill player run by and away from PAC 10 players?
It was accurate, but way too long winded. And the length only exacerbates what hes not good at. It's like watching Willie Wilson swing for the fences repeatedly when he had the wheels to steal 150 bases a year if he just kept the ball on the ground.

I learned my lesson early in college. In an English class i didnt understand a thesis so I tried to fudge it with a long, rambling paper. My TA was not fooled. She said it was the length of my paper, not the lack of content, that contributed to a poor grade, which I recall was a D double minus.
 
It was accurate, but way too long winded. And the length only exacerbates what hes not good at. It's like watching Willie Wilson swing for the fences repeatedly when he had the wheels to steal 150 bases a year if he just kept the ball on the ground.

I learned my lesson early in college. In an English class i didnt understand a thesis so I tried to fudge it with a long, rambling paper. My TA was not fooled. She said it was the length of my paper, not the lack of content, that contributed to a poor grade, which I recall was a D double minus.
Very succinct!

I think it was Lincoln who said? "The book was good but there were too many pages between the covers."
 
IowaLaw...I want you to know that this sucked much less than most of your posts. It was considerably more on point and appears you may have been watching the same game I was for the first time all year. Did you figure out live TV vs your library function on your TV or something.

Not that I would read it, but if I was you, I would add a category for the OL when you talk about the offense. Last night was the first time all year, I believe, that we had guys at guard who could play and were healthy. USC didn't sniff a sack until our freshman running back decided to double team the defensive tackle instead of picking up a blitzing linebacker. There were also few negative plays in the running game.

I've been trying to put my finger on Nate Stanley his entire career here. Great kid, great leader, great person...reads defenses with ease, and makes NFL throws in every game...also can't make high school throws in every game. It's unexplainable...but that is why they play the game.
 
Last edited:
I think these are pretty accurate comments overall. The yards gained were nearly the same, but Iowa's long drives made it a battle of attrition, which USC did not enjoy!

Stating the obvious (but still enjoying the win) a game like this leaves you wondering why such creative play calling, to avoid the opponent's strengths, just isn't there when it is needed...like PSU, WI, MI. Then it is a predictable, miserable, struggle.

It was a great game by Brian (or was it Kirk) to decide to NOT sit on the lead, but take risks to sustain drives and keep the wildly talented USC receivers on the bench for long stretches.

Nate played well, but he does drift into "brain-lock" at times...where the game is going faster than his brain. Perhaps in the NFL he can get to the point where QBs say, "The game is slowing down for me."

Hopefully Santa will be kind to Iowa and we will see many surprises, of Hawkeyes loving Iowa so much, and seeing so much returning talent that they want to stay for another season!

And Santa deliver a talented and accurate QB to run "this engine."

Would have loved to see Marsett get a TD by the run, receiving, kick off return, AND passing! Great game by him, how often have Iowa fans seen an Iowa skill player run by and away from PAC 10 players?

Those plays work against defenses like Nebraska and USC. They don't work against the 6 top 25 defenses that Iowa had to play this year.
 
Those plays work against defenses like Nebraska and USC. They don't work against the 6 top 25 defenses that Iowa had to play this year.
Hence the need for creative adjustments, rather than over and over and over... Try something, anything, different, see how it goes.

Those plays would work against most defenses, well executed.
 
IowaLaw...I want you to know that this sucked much less than most of your posts. It was considerably more on point and appears you may have been watching the same game I was for the first time all year. Did you figure out live TV vs your library function on your TV or something.

Not that I would read it, but if I was you, I would add a category for the OL when you talk about the offense. Last night was the first time all year, I believe, that we had guys at guard who could play and were healthy. USC didn't sniff a sack until our freshman running back decided to double team the defensive tackle instead of picking up a blitzing linebacker. There were also few negative plays in the running game.

I've been trying to put my finger on Nate Stanley his entire career here. Great kid, great leader, great person...reads defenses with ease, and makes NFL throws in every game...also can't make high school throws in every game. It's unexplainable...but that is why they play the game.
Which NFL QBs (current or past) would you compare Stanley to?

Trent Dilfer?
 
A 49-24 bowl game win against a blue blood to cap off a 10 win season is the best possible way to ease the pain of going the next 8 months without Hawkeye football. While the refs didn't do Iowa any favors, having USC down to their 3rd string QB was a huge break. Perhaps most encouraging today is which individuals stepped up to make the win happen. In particular:

1. Brian Ferentz - It's a rare day when IowaLaw applauds the coach's son for a job well done, but today's game plan (first play of the game aside) was impeccable. The misdirection, play calls against tendency, and aggressive offense was exactly what was needed to beat a fitness team with superior athletes. Where were those jet sweeps to Smith-Marsette and Tracy and pitches to Goodson all year? What we learned today was that the Hawks DO have the horses to score points...moving forward, let's build on this as a blue print for play calling for years to come.

2. Stanley - Nate was still Nate, but he played to the best of his abilities. His accuracy was as good as we've seen all season, 18/27 for 213 (Slovis threw for 260 playing just 1/2 the game). He showed the cannon for an arm that he's had all along, zipping balls the way only an NFL bound QB can. For reasons that I'll never understand, his play clock unawareness remained at level clueless (had 2 delay of games where he was oblivious, but the coaches called timeout to save him). He fumbled, and had some bad misses to open receivers, but all in all, Nate put the ball where it needed to go against a ranked opponent and gained the tough yards on sneaks that sealed the game. Three bowl wins is not a feat that many QBs in our lifetime will achieve, so let's give Nate his due. He's going to be near the top of Iowa's record books for decades to come.

3. Running game - I'm not sure Iowa has had a back that people love so much who produced so little. We all see the potential in Goodson and know he's going to be a stud, but today's 18 rushes for 48 yards is not one for the highlight reel. Is it all on the OL? Probably not, given Iowa has 2 NFL tackles, plus a center that the staff loves. Is it the scheme? Maybe. But at the end of the day, I would have loved to see more of what Young could do this year (just 4 rushes for 18 yards today), as he has led the team in yards per carry in pretty much every game he saw touches, but never seemed to find his way in Brian's "in crowd." My guess is either Young or Sargent bids farewell after the season is over, as there just aren't enough carries to go around.

4. Smith-Marsette - USC may have had the 2018 recruiting class's #1 overall recruit in WR St. Brown (9 catches for 163 yards), and a first round draft pick WR on the other side, but Smith-Marsette was the best offensive player on the field today. How arrogant of USC to kick to kick to him with a weak legged kicker? They paid the price with a 98 yard momentum changing return for a TD. On offense, his 46 yards receiving and 15 yards aren't necessarily eye popping, but his 2 offensive touchdowns in the first half give us hope that, for the first time since DJK and McNutt, the Hawks could have one of the best WR corps in the Big 10 next year (assuming Martin is playing over Ragaini, who had 2 more drops today). We are going to need elite WRs, as next year's QB didn't throw a meaningful pass all year.

5. LaPorta - 6 targets, 6 catches, 44 yards. That's a solid stat line for a senior tight end. LaPorta is an 18 yr old true freshmen who has only scratched the surface of his potential. This guy will be starting next year, and winning the Macky Award as a junior. He's got a knack for getting open and has better hands than most of the WRs on the team. If he can block, look out! He's going to put on 5 pounds between now and fall, so the sky is the limit.

6. AJE - It's been fun to watch the only 5 star recruit that I can remember playing for the Hawks in my lifetime. While I'd love to see him return next year, and he's just the kind of level headed star that might consider it, I think we've seen the last of AJE in a Hawkeye uniform. Two years in a row with double digit, the first to accomplish that since Matt Roth, and plenty more QB disruptions that would never show up on the stat sheet. Today, he had 4 tackles, with 2.5 sacks. While AJE was a legacy recruit, perhaps it's time for the Hawks to start mining Polynesian talent more often. The rosters at the top Pac 12 schools like USC, Washington, and Utah are loaded with them, and if AJE loved his time at Iowa, surely others could follow.
I love that you gave a shout out to LaPorta. In your 2019 recruiting analysis you were super pissed that the staff picked up LaPorta late in the cycle. How’s that analysis looking for you now. Hahaha
 
One of the comments during the game by Gus and Joel was the fact that Iowa's offense faced SIX top 30 defenses this year. USC wasn't one of those defenses, obviously. Iowa was sharp and made the plays on a big stage against a big name program that was playing very well at the end of the season. It was great to see.
 
Last edited:
UIhawk - good stats. Sargent did break off a big run...which begs the question...what is Brain's thought process in distributing carries? He's said "we play the hot hand." Goodson got virtually all of the carries (18) and averaged just 2.7 yrds per carry. Sargent, on the other hand, got 2 carries, broke off the 19 yrd run, and never touched the ball again. Young averaged 4.5 yards per carry but only touched the ball 4 times. I'm not sure there's any rhyme or reason for the in-game ball distribution, statistically.

Revkev - it's hard to say why Iowa didn't come out with similar innovative, thoughtful game plans against our Big 10 rivals. It's certainly frustrating. It's almost as though someone else intervened in the USC game planning (we had a month between games, there was more time for Ken O'Keefe and staff to weigh in). In any event, there is no reason why next year's team can't employ the same aggressive play calling, regardless of who is playing QB.

Northside - I agree having a deep pool of WRs should help open up the run game next year. With that said, we had a 3 year starter at QB and all of those same WRs this year and the run game never seemed to open up. That's not likely to change next year with a 1st year QB and an all-American tackle who leaves for the NFL. More likely, the best way to open up the run game is to change the scheme. Adding some jet sweets and pitches to Goodson like against USC will help.

Dean & Chosen - you make a good point. It's possible that Iowa's sudden offensive breakthrough was more of a product of the opponent than anything to do with the offense. Had Iowa called those same plays against Wisconsin/Penn State/Mich, the results may have been different. The play calling against USC was definitely more aggressive than we've all year, with reverses, bubble screens, and deep balls that the staff was too conservative to try against the Big boys.

At the end of the day, Iowa's offense did not rank 97th nationally based solely on the schedule we played. In fact, of Iowa's 10 wins this season, 0 were against teams that finished ranked in the top 25 (if Minn loses their bowl game).



USC jumped into a 6 man defensive front quite a few times last night. They have a really great D Tackle which I was unaware of before the game, and they have the speed to shut down outside zone so I am not surprised the hawks didnt run for a ton of yards with the backs. But the hawks did get some big run plays like Sargent's 19 yards on a 3rd and long sort of delay draw play that surprised SC. USC didnt play good backside contain defense so the reverse calls were great and added in some great yardage.

Nate at 67% with at least one throw away and a few bad throws (scratch your head) was very good. Ragaini had a couple of drops one of which was not a well throw ball when he was wide open but at the same time Ragaini also made a few very nice catches. Laporta and Beyer will be even better next year and Beyer can scoot up the hash marks well enough that we can hurt teams from a two TE alignment.

Hawks graded out as an A with me in all facets of the game except both sides of the punt game.
 
UIhawk - good stats. Sargent did break off a big run...which begs the question...what is Brain's thought process in distributing carries? He's said "we play the hot hand." Goodson got virtually all of the carries (18) and averaged just 2.7 yrds per carry. Sargent, on the other hand, got 2 carries, broke off the 19 yrd run, and never touched the ball again. Young averaged 4.5 yards per carry but only touched the ball 4 times. I'm not sure there's any rhyme or reason for the in-game ball distribution, statistically.

At the end of the day, Iowa's offense did not rank 97th nationally based solely on the schedule we played. In fact, of Iowa's 10 wins this season, 0 were against teams that finished ranked in the top 25 (if Minn loses their bowl game).

Goodson has more breakaway speed that the other two and does seem to be able to cut back better and make multiple cuts.

Young can get his yards per carry and should see more carries to bang straight ahead or inside zone. Young is good at seeing holes and making one cut but he usually doesnt make many tacklers miss at the 2nd and 3rd level. He can catch the ball though so when he is in it does not mean the defense can ignore him in pass game. If Nate throws that ball a little earlier or lower with more velocity against USC then Young has a good chance at making a big chunk yardage catch.

Sargent is still a very good runner. He had a big run against NEbby but he has a couple of fumbles this year. Sargent does not seem to have the great cutback feet that works well in the outside zone when a cutback lane opens up. But maybe he doesnt get enough chances to do it. Very good receiver.

And Goodson might be the best receiver of the running backs.
 

Latest posts

Top