Iowa up to 14th in RPI

Hillcrest1981

Well-Known Member
I have no idea what all those other numbers are. I think i'm good on SOS "strength of schedule" but what on earth is the column labeled "Luck"?
 
RPI should only get better after the Purdue game.

It really sucks that Iowa couldn't close out Iowa State :(
 
Jerry Palm has updated Iowa to a 5 seed after the michigan state game. Pretty cool to see although way too early to really matter.

Florida State hasn't lost since losing to Iowa and Marquette ripped off 9 straight wins after Iowa beat them.
 
I assume you are talking about KenPom, the luck rating is basically a figure to account for why his predictions can be off.

For example, based on Iowa's ranking, they should have a better record than they do. The difference is tossed into the luck stat. Basically means you generally lose some close games.
 
I assume you are talking about KenPom, the luck rating is basically a figure to account for why his predictions can be off.

For example, based on Iowa's ranking, they should have a better record than they do. The difference is tossed into the luck stat. Basically means you generally lose some close games.

Sports statisticians basically attribute losing close games to luck. Essentially a lot of things happen in sports that are out of your control ( officiating, bounces, etc) and because of this there is an element of luck to losing or winning close games. This had to be an attempt to chart if you're lucky or un lucky. Iowa gets a low luck rating often it seems.
 
Yeah, to clarify, Iowa is 14th in kenpom. They are 23rd in the RPI. I believe some committee members do look at kenpom, but RPI is still kind of the official metric that is used.

Iowa is usually better in kenpom than RPI because they tend to lose a lot of close games. Which is why they are also usually low in the luck rating as well.
 
You make a lot of your own luck with hustle, smarts, positioning, etc, even coaching. Mr. Davis's teams won a lot of close games by digging out loose balls, hustling, being in the right spot, etc.
 
Yeah, there's no real way to quantify what is actual luck and what is just doing the little things right or being disciplined in late game situations.

An interesting case is Providence. They are 13-1 and have an 8-1 record in games decided by 8 points or less. RPI says awesome, you won almost all those games! So they are 4th in the RPI. Kenpom says wow, you played a lot of somewhat close games and teams don't usually do that exceptionally well in close games, so they are 35th and rank very high in "luck".

The truth is surely somewhere in between, but it's always nice to have different data points to get a more well rounded view of what might actually be the truth.

RPI also thinks that ISU is better than Iowa because ISU beat us. While kenpom is going to say that a one point loss on the road at ISU is actually a good indicator that Iowa is the better team and would be favored at a neutral site - since home court advantage is worth 3-4 points.

Fanbases will generally latch onto whatever system tells them their team is the best, but it's always interesting to compare and contrast.
 
Up to 18th in the RPI today and will be even higher after the Purdue game, we're a tourney lock already. Good work on the scheduling this year.
 
Up to 18th in the RPI today and will be even higher after the Purdue game, we're a tourney lock already. Good work on the scheduling this year.

While they're not a "lock" for the tourney already I love the fact that they scheduled some really tough opponents in the non conference. one of the toughest non-conferences in the nation. Much better than plowing through a crappy non-con
 
Jerry Palm has updated Iowa to a 5 seed after the michigan state game. Pretty cool to see although way too early to really matter.

Florida State hasn't lost since losing to Iowa and Marquette ripped off 9 straight wins after Iowa beat them.

nice. I haven't been keeping up on all that.good stuff
 
Top