hawkinarkansas
Well-Known Member
For a team as hot as Illinois, this seems like a pretty big spread.
In the immortal words of Yogi Berra, ninety percent of the game is mental, the other half is physical.For a team that scores like Iowa...it's a ton of points. We've scored 3, 12, 26, 20, 22, and 23 in the last five games. 15.5 points is a lot.
"Raix Grossmon is ah quotaback"
Illinois beat Wisconsin by scoring points. Iowa can't beat Wisconsin with a broomstick.jeez...get the money on Illinois fast before that line starts to drop! Heck the Hawks were only able to beat Purdue by 6 points at home so why would anybody think they can beat Illinois by more than 2 touchdowns?
In Vegas, would love to take the points and Illinois...but will not!Vegas seems to be begging you to take Illinois. Vegas makes millions off of sucker bets cuz those dudes ain’t dumb.
Didn’t they give Minnesota 3.5 pts vs Iowa?
Posted this in another thread.
Illinois is living off turnovers. Illinois beat Wisconsin, MSU and Purdue and were +2 in TO in each of those games. They beat Rutgers and were +3 in TO. They were +3 in TO and couldn't beat Nebraska, they were +1 in TO vs Minnesota and got blown out. They were +0 in TO vs Michigan and got blown out. They were -1 in TO vs EMC and got beat.
So you are telling me KF gets to coach in a game where ball control and protecting the ball is gonna be important? Yeah, this game is tailored made for KF. I think Iowa protects the ball and covers.
As much as it may irritate me to watch, I view this game the same way I did with NW. Just take care of the ball and let the other team make the mistakes.
The only way this game gets dangerous for Iowa is if they take Illinois lightly and come out with their C game and turn the ball over.
I wouldn't at all be surprised to see Illinois gain more yards than Iowa and I could see them hitting a few big plays with #9. That kid can play. But I see this as a 10-14 point Iowa win.